2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2010.01.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry and micro-X-ray fluorescence spectrometry for elemental imaging in Daphnia magna

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, absolute levels of quantified metals varied between the methods in the range from 70.8 to 164%, with the highest variance seen in Fe levels, although within-brain regional differences in metal levels were accurately reflected in using both methods. Previous work using both XFM and LA-ICPMS imaging of the crustacean Daphnia magna showed that both techniques produce comparable distribution maps and demonstrated that both techniques exhibit advantages, depending on the specific analyte of interest, 43 though, in contrast to the data we present here, this study did not directly compare quantitative images from both methods. Direct comparison of quantitative approaches using both XFM and inductively coupled plasmaoptical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) for the production of thin film reference materials for XFM showed that, while agreement was good, variation of up to 11% was still observed between the techniques for a relatively noncomplex sample matrix.…”
Section: Analytical Chemistrycontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…Nevertheless, absolute levels of quantified metals varied between the methods in the range from 70.8 to 164%, with the highest variance seen in Fe levels, although within-brain regional differences in metal levels were accurately reflected in using both methods. Previous work using both XFM and LA-ICPMS imaging of the crustacean Daphnia magna showed that both techniques produce comparable distribution maps and demonstrated that both techniques exhibit advantages, depending on the specific analyte of interest, 43 though, in contrast to the data we present here, this study did not directly compare quantitative images from both methods. Direct comparison of quantitative approaches using both XFM and inductively coupled plasmaoptical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) for the production of thin film reference materials for XFM showed that, while agreement was good, variation of up to 11% was still observed between the techniques for a relatively noncomplex sample matrix.…”
Section: Analytical Chemistrycontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…An interesting comparison between the elemental imaging capabilities of LA-ICP-MS and micro X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry was carried out for the model organism Daphnia magna, in terms of detection power and spatial resolution, by Gholap et al [29]. Experimental results showed that the spatial resolution of LA-ICP-MS seems to be higher than that provided by micro-XRF.…”
Section: Optimisation Of the Laser And Icp-ms Parametersmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) is still not widely used in plant analysis, it provides a possibility to analyze solid samples and permits sensitive visualization of elemental distribution within the plant (126)(127)(128)). An additional advantage, especially in ionomic and genetic research, is the ability to investigate thin sections of biological tissues both quantitatively and visually.…”
Section: Instrumental Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%