2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.103.053005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of lattice QCD+QED predictions for radiative leptonic decays of light mesons with experimental data

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strategies to control the electromagnetic corrections through LQCD studies exist and the first results for the leptonic decays of kaon appeared very recently in refs. [98,99] and the result is compatible with what we used in this paper.…”
Section: Jhep05(2021)175 7 Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The strategies to control the electromagnetic corrections through LQCD studies exist and the first results for the leptonic decays of kaon appeared very recently in refs. [98,99] and the result is compatible with what we used in this paper.…”
Section: Jhep05(2021)175 7 Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Since the corresponding experimental rates are fully inclusive in the energy of the final-state photon, structuredependent contributions to the real photon emission should be included, however, the Chiral Perturbation Theory (ChPT) predictions of Ref. [35] indicate that these structure-dependent contributions are negligible for both kaon and pion decays into muons, an expectation explicitly verified in a recent lattice computation [32], where the structure dependent contributions to Γ 1 were shown to be negligible. The same is not true to the same extent for decays into final-state electrons (see Ref.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…( 35)). The most recent development has been the calculation of the radiative decays P → ν γ for light and charmed mesons, and a phenomenological comparison of our results with those from experimental measurements [30,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%