2016
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0001147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Linear and Nonlinear Models for Cohesive Sediment Detachment: Rill Erosion, Hole Erosion Test, and Streambank Erosion Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“… D r = q s ). Equation typically assumes a linear relationship ( b = 1) between applied shear stress ( τ ) and sediment detachment rate once τ c has been exceeded (Khanal et al, ). The total shear stress ( τ ) acting on the surface is: τ=italicρgRS where ρ is the density of water, g is the gravitational acceleration constant, R is the hydraulic radius (generally taken to be the flow depth), and S is the sine of the surface slope.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… D r = q s ). Equation typically assumes a linear relationship ( b = 1) between applied shear stress ( τ ) and sediment detachment rate once τ c has been exceeded (Khanal et al, ). The total shear stress ( τ ) acting on the surface is: τ=italicρgRS where ρ is the density of water, g is the gravitational acceleration constant, R is the hydraulic radius (generally taken to be the flow depth), and S is the sine of the surface slope.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement techniques that use greater applied shear stress illustrate the nonlinear behavior of cohesive sediment detachment at higher applied shear stress. The Wilson model was shown to be an appropriate erosion rate model across the wider range observed when rill erodibility tests, hole erosion tests, and jet erosion tests are combined (Khanal et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The under prediction of lateral retreat by the excess shear stress model can be attributed to the increase in applied τ around the outside of the meander located at the IL-BF site that is not correctly accounted for in the model. Previous research has shown that the Wilson model predicted lower lateral retreat closer to the observed retreat than the excess shear stress model when integrated into the Bank Stability and Toe Erosion Model (BSTEM) [45]. This was not the case when the Wilson model was incorporated into CONCEPTS for IL-BF.…”
Section: Implications For Lateral Retreat Predictionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…For the IL-BF simulations, only the erodibility parameters for the silt layer were adjusted. Wilson model parameters for the gravel layer were determined by Khanal et al [45]. For simulations on FC-FM, only the erodibility parameters for the sand layer were adjusted.…”
Section: Streambank Erosion Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation