Comparison of linear model and artificial neural network using antler beam diameter and length of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) dataset

Abstract

Evaluation of harvest data remains one of the most important sources of information in the development of strategies to manage regional populations of white-tailed deer. While descriptive statistics and simple linear models are utilized extensively, the use of artificial neural networks for this type of data analyses is unexplored. Linear model was compared to Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) models with Levenberg–Marquardt (L-M), Bayesian Regularization (BR) and Scaled Conjugate Gradient (SCG) learning algorithms, to evaluate the relative accuracy in predicting antler beam diameter and length using age and dressed body weight in white-tailed deer. Data utilized for this study were obtained from male animals harvested by hunters between 1977–2009 at the Berry College Wildlife Management Area. Metrics for evaluating model performance indicated that linear and ANN models resulted in close match and good agreement between predicted and observed values and thus good performance for all models. However, metrics values of Mean Absolute Error and Root Mean Squared Error for linear model and the ANN-BR model indicated smaller error and lower deviation relative to the mean values of antler beam diameter and length in comparison to other ANN models, demonstrating better agreement of the predicted and observed values of antler beam diameter and length. ANN-SCG model resulted in the highest error within the models. Overall, metrics for evaluating model performance from the ANN model with BR learning algorithm and linear model indicated better agreement of the predicted and observed values of antler beam diameter and length. Results of this study suggest the use of ANN generated results that are comparable to Linear Models of harvest data to aid in the development of strategies to manage white-tailed deer.

An Artificial Neural Network for Predicting Groundnut Yield Using Climatic Data

“…Through a comparative analysis of the three training algorithms, it is evident that the LM algorithm outperforms the BR and SCG algorithms. Nevertheless, both the BR and SCG algorithms still exhibit somewhat satisfactory results, although their results are not the best [12,49,50]. These results are further explained in Figure 4 for the LM algorithm.…”

Modelling seasonal dynamics of secondary growth in R

“…Among these, BRNN produced the most accurate outputs and always yielded a sigmoid-shaped function. The BRNN method generally performs well in comparative studies (Kayri 2016, Fikret Kurnaz and Kaya 2018, Peters et al 2019) and has been shown to be suitable for many ecological and environmental applications, such as tree height modelling (Skudnik and Jevšenak 2022), estimation of corn biomass from remote sensing data (Geng et al 2021) and interpolation of missing aerosol data (Chen et al 2020).…”