1975
DOI: 10.1021/ic50154a041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of linear nitrosyl and singly bent aryldiazo complexes of ruthenium. Structures of trichloronitrosylbis(triphenylphosphine)ruthenium, RuCl3(NO)(P(C6H5)3)2, and trichloro(p-tolyl)diazobis(triphenylphosphine)ruthenium-dichloromethane, RuCl3(p-NNC6H4CH3)(P(C6H5)3)2.CH2Cl2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a singly-bent or a double-bent geometry. The 1594−1576 cm -1 frequency represents, in fact, a borderline case also for the empirical rule proposed by Haymore and Ibers for which the observed and corrected νNN frequencies fall into at least two groups, those above and below 1550−1530 cm -1 , with those above characteristic of a singly-bent aryldiazenido ligand. In fact, if we hypothesize the presence of a singly-bent ArN 2 + ligand bonded to a formal Mn(1−) d 8 central metal, the observed pentacoordination results as being plausible and the complex may be compared with related iron(0) [Fe(CO) 2 (PPh 3 ) 2 (C 6 H 5 N 2 )]BF 4 29a and [Fe(ArN 2 )P 4 ]BPh 4 4b [P = P(OEt) 3 , PPh(OEt) 2 ] or cobalt(I) [Co(ArN 2 )P 4 ](BPh 4 ) 2 derivatives which show, however, a higher νN 2 frequency [1660−1760 cm -1 for Fe(0) and 1770−1790 cm -1 for Co(I)] than our compounds 5 − 7 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…a singly-bent or a double-bent geometry. The 1594−1576 cm -1 frequency represents, in fact, a borderline case also for the empirical rule proposed by Haymore and Ibers for which the observed and corrected νNN frequencies fall into at least two groups, those above and below 1550−1530 cm -1 , with those above characteristic of a singly-bent aryldiazenido ligand. In fact, if we hypothesize the presence of a singly-bent ArN 2 + ligand bonded to a formal Mn(1−) d 8 central metal, the observed pentacoordination results as being plausible and the complex may be compared with related iron(0) [Fe(CO) 2 (PPh 3 ) 2 (C 6 H 5 N 2 )]BF 4 29a and [Fe(ArN 2 )P 4 ]BPh 4 4b [P = P(OEt) 3 , PPh(OEt) 2 ] or cobalt(I) [Co(ArN 2 )P 4 ](BPh 4 ) 2 derivatives which show, however, a higher νN 2 frequency [1660−1760 cm -1 for Fe(0) and 1770−1790 cm -1 for Co(I)] than our compounds 5 − 7 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The physical properties of the {FeNO} 7 centers in 1b are comparable to those of similar mononuclear non-heme iron complexes. The ν NO value of 1785 cm -1 observed in the IR spectrum falls in the expected range for 18-electron octahedral complexes, after applying the correction for charge and considering the position of Fe in the periodic table . The presence of only one NO stretch indicates the absence of significant vibrational coupling between the two {FeNO} 7 centers, which would produce symmetric and asymmetric stretching modes which are infrared active in a complex of C s symmetry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The ν(NN) band of the aryldiazenido ligand is also present in the 1779−1720 cm -1 region and is shifted to lower frequencies (about 35 cm -1 ) in the labeled ArN⋮ 15 N compound, according to the proposed assignment. These values for the N−N stretching frequency are indicative of a singly bent aryldiazenido ligand, and this statement was shown to be correct by X-ray structure determination of 5b , discussed below. The 15 N NMR spectra also fit the presence of a singly bent ArN 2 ligand, , showing a triplet at 19.7 ppm ( 2 J 15 N 31 P = 20 Hz) due to coupling with two magnetically equivalent phosphorus nuclei for the [Fe(C 6 H 5 N⋮ 15 N)(CO) 2 {P(OEt) 3 } 2 ]BPh 4 ( 1a 1 ) derivative.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%