2001
DOI: 10.1117/12.425082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of linewidth measurements on COG masks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the sectional images, interfaces (edge positions) of a line are clearly observed by STEM and sectional SEM. From these reasons, we select to use STEM in the methods of investigation for the line width [7][8][9][10] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the sectional images, interfaces (edge positions) of a line are clearly observed by STEM and sectional SEM. From these reasons, we select to use STEM in the methods of investigation for the line width [7][8][9][10] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Periodic [2], pitch [1,7,8] and individual [9] relief structures created on a solid surface are used as test objects for calibration of SEMs and AFMs. Parameters of some of the test objects are given in Table 1, and Table 2 outlines the parameters of SEMs and AFMs that can be determined with help of these test objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linewidth for the individual structure is certified with help of ellipsometry [12]. BCR-97A/G-7 Germany trapezium with small angles of inclination of sidewalls interference pitch 400 [8] RRAS Russia right-angled profile ellipsometry linewidth 90 ÷ 500 *) [9] MShPS-2.0K Russia trapezium with large angles of inclination of sidewalls interference pitch linewidth relief height 2000 5 ÷ 1500 **) 100 ÷ 1500 **) [7] *) The range in which the certified sizes of structures RPS lie. **) The nominal values of the linewidth and the relief height are specified for the concrete sample of the test object.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, linear measurements in the nanometer range are performed using scanning electron microscopes (SEMs) [1][2][3] and atomic force microscopes (AFMs) [4][5][6]. SEM and AFM calibration is done with the help of special test objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SEM and AFM calibration is done with the help of special test objects. They are periodic relief structures [2] and pitch relief structures [4][5][6] on a solid surface. The parameters of some of the test objects are presented in table 1, and SEM and AFM parameters that can be determined using such test objects are presented in table 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%