2014
DOI: 10.5152/tjar.2014.58815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of LMA CTrach and Video Laryngoscope in Endotracheal Intubation

Abstract: Objective: In this study, our objective was to compare the Cormack and Lehane (C-L) sight scores of direct laryngoscopy in endotracheal intubation with the endoscopic sight scores of the LMA CTrach and video laryngoscope. We also compared the success of endoscopy with the LMA CTrach and video laryngoscopy, intubation time, and its effects on haemodynamic and stress responses. Methods:The study included 100 patients, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores I-III and aged 18-65, who will undergo … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to previous studies, when anesthesiologists faced patients with general anesthesia in the operating room, the time to complete endotracheal intubation was about 84 seconds [ 10 ], the time to complete LMA Supreme laryngeal mask implantation was about 27 seconds, and the time to complete I-gel laryngeal mask implantation was about 19 seconds [ 11 ], which were shorter than those in this study. The time in the operating room comes from patients after general anesthesia, while the time of this study comes from the simulated human.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…According to previous studies, when anesthesiologists faced patients with general anesthesia in the operating room, the time to complete endotracheal intubation was about 84 seconds [ 10 ], the time to complete LMA Supreme laryngeal mask implantation was about 27 seconds, and the time to complete I-gel laryngeal mask implantation was about 19 seconds [ 11 ], which were shorter than those in this study. The time in the operating room comes from patients after general anesthesia, while the time of this study comes from the simulated human.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%