2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00340-013-5573-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of loading double-loop microtraps from a surface MOT and a FORT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zeeman sublevel had a temperature of only ± 11 2 μK. The lower temperature achieved using FORT loading was consistent with our previous experiment that used a larger microtrap [15]. It arises because evaporative cooling is facilitated when the FORT laser power is ramped down [23][24][25].…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Zeeman sublevel had a temperature of only ± 11 2 μK. The lower temperature achieved using FORT loading was consistent with our previous experiment that used a larger microtrap [15]. It arises because evaporative cooling is facilitated when the FORT laser power is ramped down [23][24][25].…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…The apparatus is similar to that described in our previous work and is therefore only briefly discussed here [14,15]. The atom chip was housed in a pyrex cell that was pumped down to a pressure of − 10 10 torr using a combination titanium sublimation and ion pump.…”
Section: Apparatus and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This paper reviews the so called double-loop microtrap consisting of two concentric loops carrying opposite currents [30][31][32]. This trap can be readily daisy chained in series to create a one-or two-dimensional microtrap array.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%