Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2001.990538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of local plane fitting methods for range data

Abstract: In this research, we introduce a reasonable noise model for range data which is obtained by a laser radar range jnder, and derive two simple approximate solutions of the optimal local planejtting the range data under the noise model. Then we compare our methods with the general least-squares based methods, such as Z-function fitting, the eigenvalue method, and the maximum likelihood estimation method, as well as the re-normalization method, which is an iterative method to obtain the optimal fitting of planes o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The essence of the plane fitting of point cloud data is to find a fitting plane to approximately replace the selected points, and the existing plane fitting algorithms are least squares, z-function fitting, the eigenvalue method, maximum likelihood estimation method, etc. [26]. This paper is mainly based on the least squares method for plane fitting to minimize the sum of the squares of the distances from all points in the point cloud to the fitting plane.…”
Section: Constructing a Complete Point Cloud 231 Fitting The Bottom S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The essence of the plane fitting of point cloud data is to find a fitting plane to approximately replace the selected points, and the existing plane fitting algorithms are least squares, z-function fitting, the eigenvalue method, maximum likelihood estimation method, etc. [26]. This paper is mainly based on the least squares method for plane fitting to minimize the sum of the squares of the distances from all points in the point cloud to the fitting plane.…”
Section: Constructing a Complete Point Cloud 231 Fitting The Bottom S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fitting result might be different, when the evaluation criteria or optim ization objective function is different. The common plane fitting methods include least square method (LSM) [22], algebraic least square method (ALSM) [23], re-normalization method (RM) [24], maximum likelihood method (MLM) [25].…”
Section: Calculation Of the Planementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a set of noisy points known or hypothesized to lie on a plane, the "optimum" plane can be extracted from them using methods surveyed in [17]. The main methods are that of least-squares [17,19] and renormalization [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main methods are that of least-squares [17,19] and renormalization [4,5]. The latter uses a more detailed error-model for the 3D points which results in better estimations with respect to the assumed model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%