2021
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3864920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Local Projection Estimators for Proxy Vector Autoregressions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identification by heteroskedasticity has seen increasing implementation in recent research (Sims, 2021;Lütkepohl and Schlaak, 2022;Bruns and Lütkepohl, 2023;Schlaak et al, 2023;Jarociński, 2024). The approach enables the identification of structural shocks based only on the identifying assumption that the volatilities of the time series have changed.…”
Section: Changes In Exchange Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification by heteroskedasticity has seen increasing implementation in recent research (Sims, 2021;Lütkepohl and Schlaak, 2022;Bruns and Lütkepohl, 2023;Schlaak et al, 2023;Jarociński, 2024). The approach enables the identification of structural shocks based only on the identifying assumption that the volatilities of the time series have changed.…”
Section: Changes In Exchange Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our large-scale set-up differs from prior simulation studies of LP and VAR methods, which have considered at most a handful of DGPs. Examples include Jordà (2005), Meier (2005), Kilian & Kim (2011), Brugnolini (2018, Choi & Chudik (2019), Austin (2020), andBruns &Lütkepohl (2021). These papers either obtain their DGPs from stylized, lowdimensional VARMA models, calibrated DSGE models, and/or a few empirically calibrated VAR models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%