2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.geodrs.2022.e00595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of long-term field-measured and RUSLE-based modelled soil loss in Switzerland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those we have indicate relatively low average erosion rates and occasional extreme events: this is to be expected as, by definition, extreme events are rare (Table 1). Rates of erosion shown in the table are low, far lower than those predicted from current modelling studies (e.g., Bircher et al, 2022). Also, they are lower than those from the wilder predictions of looming global catastrophe (Lymbery, 2022;Ritchie, 2021), although erosion rates in global hotspots are of greater concern than is erosion in western Europe (Boardman, 2006;Golosov & Walling, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Those we have indicate relatively low average erosion rates and occasional extreme events: this is to be expected as, by definition, extreme events are rare (Table 1). Rates of erosion shown in the table are low, far lower than those predicted from current modelling studies (e.g., Bircher et al, 2022). Also, they are lower than those from the wilder predictions of looming global catastrophe (Lymbery, 2022;Ritchie, 2021), although erosion rates in global hotspots are of greater concern than is erosion in western Europe (Boardman, 2006;Golosov & Walling, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Evans & Boardman, 2016). Recent detailed analysis of Swiss data shows modelled soil loss values substantially higher (by a factor of 8) than field‐mapped values (Bircher et al, 2022). Field‐scale monitoring allows us to evaluate the impact of future changes in land use and climate and provide reliable input into models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil and water conservation measures inhibit soil erosion and can reflect the difference in soil erosion status before and after the implementation of soil and water conservation measures [24,25]. The P factor is the ratio of soil loss from the plot after the implementation of soil and water conservation measures to soil loss from the plot without any soil and water conservation measures, all other things being equal [26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Quantitative Equations For Soil and Water Conservation Measu...mentioning
confidence: 99%