2022
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11051430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes and Associated Factors between Younger and Older Rural Ischemic Stroke Patients

Abstract: Introduction: The rise of ischemic stroke among young adults has stressed the need to understand their risk profiles and outcomes better. This study aimed to examine the five-year ischemic stroke recurrence and survival probability among young patients in rural Pennsylvania. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included first-time ischemic stroke patients from the Geisinger Health System between September 2003 and May 2014. The outcomes included all-cause mortality and ischemic stroke recurrence at five ye… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An I 2 statistic greater than 60% with a Q test with p < 0.10 was considered a significant statistical heterogeneity. To further assess the possible impact of other moderators on outcomes in each AD-Design, we performed a meta-regression including the following parameters: age (⩽55 vs >56 years), 32 gender, time from visual loss to thrombolysis, heparin administration (after the thrombolysis), antiplatelet therapy, the language of publication (English vs non-English), and having 2 or more weeks of follow-up before final VA. We used two-step random-effects models with double arcsine transformations and DerSimonian-Laird estimator for estimating ⩾0.1 logMAR, ⩾0.3 logMAR, and ⩾20/100 VA improvement. We used raw MC and standardized MC using change score standardization (SMCC) to assess the MC in logMAR after the intervention.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An I 2 statistic greater than 60% with a Q test with p < 0.10 was considered a significant statistical heterogeneity. To further assess the possible impact of other moderators on outcomes in each AD-Design, we performed a meta-regression including the following parameters: age (⩽55 vs >56 years), 32 gender, time from visual loss to thrombolysis, heparin administration (after the thrombolysis), antiplatelet therapy, the language of publication (English vs non-English), and having 2 or more weeks of follow-up before final VA. We used two-step random-effects models with double arcsine transformations and DerSimonian-Laird estimator for estimating ⩾0.1 logMAR, ⩾0.3 logMAR, and ⩾20/100 VA improvement. We used raw MC and standardized MC using change score standardization (SMCC) to assess the MC in logMAR after the intervention.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All models were adjusted for patients' age (⩽55 vs >56 years). 32 For the I 2 statistic, p < 0.1, univariate regression models p < 0.15, and in other analyses two-sided p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Data were synthesized by the "metafor" package, R program, version 4.2.2.…”
Section: Data Synthesis and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The age cutoff is also epidemiologically meaningful to monitor the IS risk factors and incidence among different age brackets, and investigate rare causes, especially genetic predispositions. In our previous study on young stroke patients’ outcomes, we used multiple upper-age cut-points (43.7, 49.0, and 55.0 years) to define the young IS cohort [ 14 ]. The current study aimed to determine the age cut-point for defining “young stoke” in men and women, using a data-driven approach and comprehensive clinical data from a large, mainly rural, population in the United States.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%