Comparison of longitudinal changes in clinical periodontal parameters of canines and first molars treated with fixed orthodontic appliances

Agrawal, Neeraj; Kundu, Debtosh; Agrawal, Kavita; Singhal, Abhinav

doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.041

Cited by 11 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In accordance with their study, the current study reported significantly higher values for pocket depth and GI for teeth with bands in comparison with teeth treated with brackets. The results of the present study agree with those of Naga Sri and Sosa,[3] who reported a significant increase in plaque scores, gingival scores, and pocket probing depths in the experimental group following tooth banding.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

“…[2] Improper cementation of bands on the tooth leads to local tissue response due to several factors such as plaque accumulation, close proximity to the gingival sulcus, and the increased area of the tooth that is covered, which makes oral hygiene maintenance difficult. [3] Direct injury to the gingiva as a result of overextended bands[4] and mechanical or chemical irritation due to exposed cement also causes a local tissue response that may lead to inflammation with additional difficulty in brushing and flossing.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluation of chemokines in gingival crevicular fluid in children with band and loop space maintainers: A clinico-biochemical study

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:Chemokines are pro-inflammatory cells that can be induced during an immune response to recruit cells of the immune system to a site of infection.Aim:This study was conducted to detect the presence of chemokines, macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α), and 1β (MIP-1β) and estimate their levels in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) in children with band and loop space maintainers.Materials and Methods:MIP-1α and MIP-1β levels were estimated in GCF samples from twenty healthy children and twenty children with band and loop space maintainers. Periodontal status was evaluated by measuring gingival index, plaque index, and Russell's periodontal index. The GCF samples were quantified by ELISA, and the levels of MIP-1α and MIP-1β were determined.Results:The mean MIP-1α concentrations in healthy children and those with space maintainers were 395.75 pg/µl and 857.85 pg/µl, respectively, and MIP-1β was 342.55 pg/µl and 685.25 pg/µl, respectively. MIP-1α and MIP-1β levels in GCF from children with space maintainers were significantly higher than in the healthy group, and statistically significant difference existed between these two groups.Conclusion:MIP-1α and MIP-1β can be considered as novel biomarkers in the biological mechanism underlying the pathogenesis of gingival inflammation in children with space maintainers.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of chemokines in gingival crevicular fluid in children with band and loop space maintainers: A clinico-biochemical study

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Sim et al [33] observed that the orthodontic treatment group exhibited a lower prevalence of periodontitis compared with the non-orthodontic treatment group, what may due to the fact that tooth alignment that facilitates oral hygiene. However, Agrawal et al [34] concluded that orthodontic treatment can cause damages to the periodontium, not just in biofilm accumulation and gingival inflammation but also in attachment loss that can occur due to other factors such as tooth extraction and canine movement, tooth movement, incisors inclination, and occlusal trauma during treatment. Also, other factors can interfere with periodontal tissues, such as heavy orthodontic forces and tooth movement which may reduce the alveolar bone thickness and interdental alveolar bone [35,36].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical, microbiological, and immunological evaluation of patients in corrective orthodontic treatment

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The objective was to analyze clinical, microbiological, and immunological periodontal parameters in patients in corrective orthodontic treatment. Materials and methods: Twenty-eight patients were selected. Plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), width of keratinized gingiva, levels of 40 bacterial species, and of 3 cytokines (IL-1β, MMP-8, and TNF-α) in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) were evaluated at T0, before orthodontic treatment; T1, 6 months; and T2, 12 months posttreatment. Non-parametric, Friedman, Wilcoxon, ANOVA, and Spearman correlation coefficient tests were used for statistical analyses, with the significance level of 5%. Results: No significant difference was found for the width of keratinized gingiva, but PI presented a significant increase at T1 and T2 (p < 0.05) when compared with T0. The percentage of sites with BOP increased significantly from T0 to T1 (p < 0.05); however, at T2, the values decreased and did not differ anymore from T0 (p > 0.05). In the microbiological analysis, red complex pathogens were in significantly greater proportions in T2 compared with T0 (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the cytokine levels between the periods but there was a positive correlation between BOP and IL-1β (r = 0.49 p = .01) and TNF-α (r = 0.39 and p = .05). Conclusion: In conclusion, corrective orthodontic treatment caused clinical periodontal alterations regarding biofilm accumulation and gingival bleeding, with alteration of periodontopathogens.

show abstract

“…1,2 The recent advancements in the area of orthodontic bonding have suggested the replacement of molar banding with bonding, as banding deteriorates the periodontal status of dentition. 3,4 Successful orthodontic treatment should not only corrects the malocclusion but should also keep the attachment apparatus sound and healthy. 5 Many patients undergoing orthodontic therapy have large amalgam restorations on their posterior teeth as amalgams are still preferred over composite restorations in teeth having large carious defects.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Surface Conditioning Protocols on The Shear Bond Strength of Metal Brackets Bonded To Amalgam Surface

Azeem¹,

Haq²,

Qadir³

2018

J Pak Dent Assoc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVE:Orthodontists more often comes across amalgam restoration as a surface to bond brackets. The objective of current study was to compare the mean shear bond strength of orthodontic metal brackets bonded on sandblasted versus diamond bur roughened amalgam surfaces. METHODOLOGY: Current In-vitro, comparative study was conducted at Orthodontic department of Faisalabad medical university from 17.2.2017 to 17.8.2017. Sixty extracted human maxillary molars were included in the study as per inclusion criteria. They were randomly divided into two groups. In group-A, metal brackets were bonded to amalgam using sandblasting with 50 ?m alumina particles. In group-B, brackets were bonded after roughening the amalgam surface with diamond bur. Shear bond strength (SB) was measured and compared using universal testing machine, in both the groups. RESULTS: SB of metal brackets bonded with sandblasting (17.05±5.9 MPa) was significantly higher than diamond bur roughened group (11.08±4.0 MPa). CONCLUSION: Amalgam surface treatment with sandblasting increased the shear bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets significantly higher than the diamond bur roughening.

show abstract

Comparison of longitudinal changes in clinical periodontal parameters of canines and first molars treated with fixed orthodontic appliances

Cited by 11 publications

References 24 publications

Evaluation of chemokines in gingival crevicular fluid in children with band and loop space maintainers: A clinico-biochemical study

Evaluation of chemokines in gingival crevicular fluid in children with band and loop space maintainers: A clinico-biochemical study

Clinical, microbiological, and immunological evaluation of patients in corrective orthodontic treatment

Comparison of Surface Conditioning Protocols on The Shear Bond Strength of Metal Brackets Bonded To Amalgam Surface

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About