2022 IEEE 8th Information Technology International Seminar (ITIS) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/itis57155.2022.10009036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of LSTM and GRU in Predicting the Number of Diabetic Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison between LSTM and GRU models [8,13] revealed that GRU might offer better accuracy in certain contexts, suggesting that the choice of model architecture could be crucial depending on the specific nature of the diabetes data being analysed. The BiLSTM with Attention model [9], which employed EHRs for prediction, reportedly achieved higher precision and recall than traditional methods, although exact figures were not specified, highlighting the potential of attention mechanisms in enhancing LSTM model performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A comparison between LSTM and GRU models [8,13] revealed that GRU might offer better accuracy in certain contexts, suggesting that the choice of model architecture could be crucial depending on the specific nature of the diabetes data being analysed. The BiLSTM with Attention model [9], which employed EHRs for prediction, reportedly achieved higher precision and recall than traditional methods, although exact figures were not specified, highlighting the potential of attention mechanisms in enhancing LSTM model performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model indicated the potential of LSTM in early detection and diagnosis of diabetes. Rochman et al [8] took a comparative approach, analysing LSTM against Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) models. Their study highlighted the nuanced differences between these architectures, contributing to a better understanding of their respective strengths and limitations in diabetes prediction.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison between LSTM and GRU models [8,13] revealed that GRU might offer better accuracy in certain contexts, suggesting that the choice of model architecture could be crucial depending on the specific nature of the diabetes data being analysed. The BiLSTM with the Attention model [9], which employed EHRs for prediction, reportedly achieved higher precision and recall than traditional methods, although exact figures were not specified, highlighting the potential of attention mechanisms in enhancing LSTM model performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model indicated the potential of LSTM in the early detection and diagnosis of diabetes. Rochman et al [8] took a comparative approach, analysing LSTM against Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) models. Their study highlighted the nuanced differences between these architectures, contributing to a better understanding of their respective strengths and limitations in diabetes prediction.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation