1992
DOI: 10.1021/ie00001a007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of lumped and molecular modeling of hydropyrolysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As regards species lumping method, the critical issue is determining which species to lump, classifying the contribution of each selected species to the lumped ones, and estimating their kinetic parameters (Stagni et al, 2013). In the chemical lumping method, species are lumped according to their chemical structure (Liguras and Allen, 1992), while mathematically based approaches rely on formal transformation rules between original and lumped variables (Pinto et al, 1999). The first approach requires wide chemical expertise, e.g., at high temperatures, FIGURE 9 | Experimental (symbols)-numerical (lines) comparison of ignition delay times for n-butanol/air mixture: (A) Pressure = 15 bar, equivalence ratio = 0.5 (spheres), 1.0 (squares), 2.0 (triangles), (B) equivalence ratio=1.0, P = 10 atm (spheres), P = 20 atm (squares), P = 40 atm (triangles).…”
Section: Development Of a Reduced Chemical Mechanism For Combustion Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As regards species lumping method, the critical issue is determining which species to lump, classifying the contribution of each selected species to the lumped ones, and estimating their kinetic parameters (Stagni et al, 2013). In the chemical lumping method, species are lumped according to their chemical structure (Liguras and Allen, 1992), while mathematically based approaches rely on formal transformation rules between original and lumped variables (Pinto et al, 1999). The first approach requires wide chemical expertise, e.g., at high temperatures, FIGURE 9 | Experimental (symbols)-numerical (lines) comparison of ignition delay times for n-butanol/air mixture: (A) Pressure = 15 bar, equivalence ratio = 0.5 (spheres), 1.0 (squares), 2.0 (triangles), (B) equivalence ratio=1.0, P = 10 atm (spheres), P = 20 atm (squares), P = 40 atm (triangles).…”
Section: Development Of a Reduced Chemical Mechanism For Combustion Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many reactions consist of more than one reactant, which complicates depiction by this method. Sandefur et al gave a series of graph methods to depict complex reactions …”
Section: The Tools and Their Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jiao et al and Jia et al established detailed mechanisms for n -decane thermal cracking, and Dahm et al and Herbinet et al showed the detailed mechanisms for n -dodecane. Detailed models are important in chemistry, but they require a large number of computations when used in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, which makes these models difficult to use for engineering purposes. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%