2010
DOI: 10.2514/1.j050025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Mach 10 Scramjet Measurements from Different Impulse Facilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sub-designscale testing is standard practice in the field of hypersonics due to size constraints imposed by the available wind tunnel facilities. Typically, to achieve similitude of the flow field between a sub-scale wind tunnel experiment and full-scale flight article, some form of scaling of the flow condition is required (Bushnell, 2006;McGilvray et al, 2010). The predominant scaling method used for supersonic combustion experiments is the binary scaling method (Hornung, 1988;Stalker and Pulsonetti, 2004) for which the flow velocity, temperature and gas composition of the test condition are matched to flight while the density is adjusted such that the product of density and length remains constant.…”
Section: Influence Of Flight Dynamic Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sub-designscale testing is standard practice in the field of hypersonics due to size constraints imposed by the available wind tunnel facilities. Typically, to achieve similitude of the flow field between a sub-scale wind tunnel experiment and full-scale flight article, some form of scaling of the flow condition is required (Bushnell, 2006;McGilvray et al, 2010). The predominant scaling method used for supersonic combustion experiments is the binary scaling method (Hornung, 1988;Stalker and Pulsonetti, 2004) for which the flow velocity, temperature and gas composition of the test condition are matched to flight while the density is adjusted such that the product of density and length remains constant.…”
Section: Influence Of Flight Dynamic Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former was used by McGilvray [74] for the first test of a nose-to-tail scramjet engine in an expansion tube. For this study a Mach 10.1, 165 kPa dynamic pressure condition was developed for a test time of 550 µs and a total enthalpy of 5.3 MJ kg −1 [142]. The authors tested a 2 5 scaled 2D hydrogen-fuelled scramjet derived from an existing scramjet tested in T4 [142], the large-scale RST facility operated by the University.…”
Section: Scramjet Testing In Expansion Tubesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this study a Mach 10.1, 165 kPa dynamic pressure condition was developed for a test time of 550 µs and a total enthalpy of 5.3 MJ kg −1 [142]. The authors tested a 2 5 scaled 2D hydrogen-fuelled scramjet derived from an existing scramjet tested in T4 [142], the large-scale RST facility operated by the University. The study compared the results obtained from the two facilities, and showed good agreement in comparison to the experimental uncertainties [142].…”
Section: Scramjet Testing In Expansion Tubesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…McGilvary et al (2010) [65] applied the PL scaling criteria in the testing of two scaled Mach 10 scramjet engines in the University of Queensland's T4 reflected shock tunnel and X2 expansion tube. Test section size restrictions and test time limitations of the X2 expansion tube required the test model to be a 40% length scale model of the engine tested in the T4 reflected shock tunnel.…”
Section: Scaling Studies Of Scramjetsmentioning
confidence: 99%