Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Sepsis Detection

Abstract

Sepsis is a very fatal disease, causing a lot of causalities all over the world, about 2, 70,000 die of Sepsis annually, thus early detection of Sepsis disease would be a remedy to prevent this disease and it would be a big relief to the family of sepsis patients. Different researchers have worked on sepsis disease detection and its prediction but still the need to have an improved model for Sepsis detection remains. We compared various machine learning algorithms for Sepsis detection and used the dataset publicly available for all the researchers at Physionet.org, the dataset contains many empty or Null values, we applied backward filling and forward filling techniques, and we calculated missing values of MAP using equation (1) which gives more precise results, we divided the 40,336 files of datasets A and B into 80% training set and 20% testing set. We applied the algorithms twice one time using vital signs and clinical values of patients and the second time using only vital signs of the patients; using vital signs only the training accuracy of KNN, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, MLP, and Decision Trees was 0.992, 0.999, 0.981, 0.981, and 0.981 respectively, while the testing accuracy of KNN, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, MLP, and Decision Trees was 0.987, 0.980, 0.983, 0.981, and 0.981 respectively, for Sepsis Label 0, the value of precision for KNN, Random Forest, Decision Trees, Logistic Regression, and MLP was 0.99, 0.98, 0.98, 0.98, and 0.98 respectively, while the value of recall for KNN, Random Forest, Decision Trees, Logistic Regression, and MLP was 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, and 1.00 respectively; the comparison of all the above-mentioned algorithms showed that KNN leads over all the competitors regarding the accuracy, precision, and recall.

Reliability Awareness Multiple Path Installation in Software Defined Networking using Machine Learning Algorithm

“…To address this network limitation, other Machine Learning (ML) techniques as prediction solutions that are well-defined and realistic are required. To recover the delay that occurs in the network, the authors present novel routing rules or protocols methodology based on SDN and Naive Bays algorithms (ML algorithms) [19]. According to the simulation's results, their routing system exceeds the competition regarding the end-to-end delay and data transmission ratio.…”

Double Auction used Artificial Neural Network in Cloud Computing

“…To avoid this problem, G-TRAP had introduced in edge computing and cloud computing. Offloading task performed by DA algorithm where it takes from cellular phone sends to servers were computation process and give return to auction algorithm [14]. Offloading task was requested by mobile devices and services are provided by datacenters, all these services run in the application where blockchain is used, but the problem is they only focus on resource distribution and do not involve a learning mechanism [15].…”

Critical Review of Blockchain Consensus Algorithms: challenges and opportunities

“…Permissioned Blockchain claims advantages over public Blockchain, like the capability to partition the segments where validation of a transaction is done by a specific group of nodes. Other merits are the trustworthiness of nodes, use of consensus algorithms, and promising far more throughput [15].…”