2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of machine learning models for the detection of partial defects in spent nuclear fuel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dataset for the study relies on previous work performed at SCK CEN (Rossa et al, 2020(Rossa et al, , 2018. It includes the PDET responses simulated via Monte Carlo N-Particle -MCNP code (Werner, 2018) for 17 × 17 PWR spent nuclear fuel assemblies with and without diversion, see Fig.…”
Section: Pdet Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dataset for the study relies on previous work performed at SCK CEN (Rossa et al, 2020(Rossa et al, , 2018. It includes the PDET responses simulated via Monte Carlo N-Particle -MCNP code (Werner, 2018) for 17 × 17 PWR spent nuclear fuel assemblies with and without diversion, see Fig.…”
Section: Pdet Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent efforts have been conducted to develop methods that can enhance the processing of the measured data and extract more details of the system configuration. For example, machine learning algorithms were used to quantify the percentage of replaced fuel pins in SNF assemblies (Rossa et al, 2020(Rossa et al, , 2018Aldbissi et al, 2022), to predict parameters of SNF assemblies (Mishra et al, 2021), to detect and localize missing radioactive sources within a small grid (Durbin and Lintereur, 2020), to track elemental and isotopic material flows through material balance areas for safeguards (Shoman and Cipiti, 2018). These methods can help to reduce the inspection time and make the identification of diversion patterns more precise, so that the decision process of the inspectors is facilitated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fourth partial defect scenario was also simulated where the rods were removed without replacement, leaving a water gap in the fuel assembly. The partial defect pattern denoted as case 1 in figure 2 is the same as that used in [12]. The substitution is symmetric and concentrated to the edges of the assembly, making the case one of the more difficult ones for the DCVD to detect.…”
Section: Jinst 15 P07009mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of such fuel libraries already exist for light water reactors (LWRs) [ 5 , 6 ]. There have been numerous research works looking into the possibility of using machine learning techniques for verification of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) LWRs [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] with reasonable success. However, such work looking into using conventional and possibly new verification signatures for MSRs is severely limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%