2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10922-021-09629-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques for VNF Resource Requirements Prediction in NFV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This involves the development and evaluation of algorithms that intend to predict and address the network's resources needs dynamically by deploying VNF instances over the virtualized infrastructure. The works given in [23], [24], [25] and [26] provide a model of these solutions.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This involves the development and evaluation of algorithms that intend to predict and address the network's resources needs dynamically by deploying VNF instances over the virtualized infrastructure. The works given in [23], [24], [25] and [26] provide a model of these solutions.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposal of numerous NFV and mobile networking management mechanisms leveraging state-of-the-art machine learning techniques has garnered huge interest in recent years throughout the research community. 2,3,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Despite this enthusiasm, deep knowledge of several aspects of NFV as a whole (MANO, services, overhead reduction, latency minimization, etc.) and of the potential, but also of the limitations of machine learning techniques are crucial to designing robust, simple and valuable solutions to the administrators of NFVIs.…”
Section: Ml-based Vnf Resource Usage Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the resulting resource usage forecasts of many time steps of different resource attributes from an SFC provide high-accuracy, high-fidelity predictions since they benefit from variations in resource loads of multiple resource attributes that are highly correlated to those targeted resource attributes that we aim to forecast. For instance, some traditional time series-based prediction approaches like auto-regressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) enhanced with trend and seasonality filtering, 5 decision tree (DT) and support vector regression, 13 Markov decision process, 15 and softmax regression 12 are still popular because of their effectiveness, swiftness and overall simplicity at predicting future resource usage of non-stationary, univariate resource attributes like CPU, memory, disk I/O, or network traffic. However, since these approaches leverage univariate (i.e., take historical data from a single resource attribute to predict a resource usage horizon of that same attribute) resource usage history to forecast a resource usage horizon, none of them can reinforce their predictions from resource usage inter-dependencies from multiple correlated sources.…”
Section: Ml-based Vnf Resource Usage Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations