2015
DOI: 10.1097/fjc.0000000000000296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Macitentan and Bosentan on Right Ventricular Remodeling in a Rat Model of Non-vasoreactive Pulmonary Hypertension

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content Is Available in the Text.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It would be important to test whether infusion of vasodilators in the Su/Hx model in vivo affects pulmonary arterial pressure. Interestingly, a recent study demonstrated that acute intravenous infusion of the vasodilator agent adenosine caused a dose-dependent reduction in pulmonary artery pressure in anesthetized Wistar rats with Su/Hx-induced PH (Iglarz et al, 2015), suggesting that at an earlier 5-week time point, there is a reactive component of PH in this rat strain. Whether this reactive component of PH to vasodilators could still be observed at a later 7-week time point and in the Sprague-Dawley rat model of Su/Hx remains to be investigated.…”
Section: Pulmonary Vascular Dysfunction In Pulmonary Hypertensionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It would be important to test whether infusion of vasodilators in the Su/Hx model in vivo affects pulmonary arterial pressure. Interestingly, a recent study demonstrated that acute intravenous infusion of the vasodilator agent adenosine caused a dose-dependent reduction in pulmonary artery pressure in anesthetized Wistar rats with Su/Hx-induced PH (Iglarz et al, 2015), suggesting that at an earlier 5-week time point, there is a reactive component of PH in this rat strain. Whether this reactive component of PH to vasodilators could still be observed at a later 7-week time point and in the Sprague-Dawley rat model of Su/Hx remains to be investigated.…”
Section: Pulmonary Vascular Dysfunction In Pulmonary Hypertensionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Compound 3 was tested in a head-to-head comparison with macitentan, an orally active, potent, dual endothelin (ET) A and B receptor antagonist currently in use to treat PAH patients. Compared to other endothelin receptor antagonists, macitentan has improved tissue targeting, a longer duration of action and an improved safety profile (DuBrock and Channick, 2014;Iglarz et al, 2015). An interventional treatment regimen was adopted for both macitentan and Compound 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, we found that also macitentan did not significantly prevent RV hypertrophy despite a trend. Although a positive effect of macitentan against MCT-induced RV hypertrophy was previously reported, it should be noted that the treatment regimen was preventative as started immediately after MCT injection and lasted for 4 weeks (Iglarz et al, 2015). Thus, a clear effect on RV hypertrophy in the MCT rat model may require preventative treatments or interventional treatments lasting longer than 2 weeks.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 92%
“…5 Characteristic features of this compound are sustained receptor binding and enhanced tissue penetration. 6, 7 Recently, a multi-national phase III trial (SERAPHIN) of this compound was carried out using a primary endpoint reflecting long-term disease progression, and the risk for morbidity and mortality was significantly reduced by 45% on 10 mg macitentan compared with placebo in symptomatic PAH patients. 8 Japanese patients, however, were not enrolled in the multi-national study, and the Japanese regulatory authority proposed a clinical trial with only Japanese patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%