2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of macular and peripapillary measurements for the detection of glaucoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

19
162
3
8

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 291 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
19
162
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AROC), some studies have shown the overall RNFL thickness average to be the best diagnostic parameter. 11,13,14,16,19 Other studies have shown the inferior 10,17,20 or superior 21 quadrant RNFL thickness average to be the best, in agreement with clinical observation that glaucomatous optic nerve damage seems to begin in the inferotemporal or superotemporal area. [22][23][24] It is logical that optimal glaucoma detection might best employ a combination of several parameters.…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AROC), some studies have shown the overall RNFL thickness average to be the best diagnostic parameter. 11,13,14,16,19 Other studies have shown the inferior 10,17,20 or superior 21 quadrant RNFL thickness average to be the best, in agreement with clinical observation that glaucomatous optic nerve damage seems to begin in the inferotemporal or superotemporal area. [22][23][24] It is logical that optimal glaucoma detection might best employ a combination of several parameters.…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…It will also be used in comparative studies with parameters generated by other instruments, such as scanning laser topography and scanning laser polarimetry. Previous comparative studies used only the best single parameter to evaluate the diagnostic performance of OCT. 10,11,13,14,16,17,[19][20][21] This underestimates the diagnostic power of OCT. The OSI combination will significantly improve OCT's diagnostic performance in both clinical studies and clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study with SD OCT shows that although the performance of macular parameters improved compared to stratus OCT (thus corroborating with Zeimer's hypothesis) [3] , they did not outperform RNFL parameters in the diagnostic ability to detect early glaucoma [15] . This necessitates development of better OCT scanning techniques and segmentation algorithms to provide more accurate macular measurements.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Initial studies examining the role of macular thickness measurements in glaucoma found that quantification of full retinal thickness was helpful for glaucoma diagnosis (Giovannini et al, 2002;Greenfield et al, 2003;Guedes et al, 2003;Lederer et al, 2003;Leung et al, 2005;Medeiros et al, 2005b). Though as thickness of the outer retina is largely unchanged in glaucoma, inclusion of outer retinal layers, such as the outer plexiform layer, outer nuclear layer, and photoreceptor segment layers, may reduce the sensitivity with which glaucomatous damage can be detected.…”
Section: Imaging the Maculamentioning
confidence: 99%