2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2011.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of mass transfer models for the numerical prediction of sheet cavitation around a hydrofoil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
78
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the satisfactory results for the hydrofoil [9] where good agreement was found between prediction and measurements and no significant differences were observed between the different models, the mass transfer models were applied to the Venturi section geometries. For the purpose of steady flow study, the Venturi type test section geometry used by Barre [4] was adopted in the first step.…”
Section: Results Validation On the Venturi Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Following the satisfactory results for the hydrofoil [9] where good agreement was found between prediction and measurements and no significant differences were observed between the different models, the mass transfer models were applied to the Venturi section geometries. For the purpose of steady flow study, the Venturi type test section geometry used by Barre [4] was adopted in the first step.…”
Section: Results Validation On the Venturi Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To properly tune the different mass transfer models, and consequently to compare and use them, a calibration strategy based on the modeFRONTIER 4.2 optimisation system was developed and presented in [9]. The optimisation results are summarised in the table below.…”
Section: The Calibration Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Examples of recent review articles on this topic can be found in [8,10,14,15]. The selection of an appropriate model for cavitating flow simulation is very delicate.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%