2022
DOI: 10.2399/prn.22.0302005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes in twin pregnancies according to delivery types: vaginal delivery or Cesarean delivery?

Abstract: Objective: Our aim was to compare the maternal and neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies, which result in vaginal delivery (VD) and Cesarean section (CS), and the factors affecting the decision of CS. Methods: Twin pregnancies between 30 and 39 weeks who gave birth in a tertiary center were included in the present study. The demographic data and maternal and neonatal outcomes of the patient groups who gave birth <32 weeks, 32–37 weeks, and >37 weeks were recorded and compared according to the type of bir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…APGAR scores seemed better for the first twins at the first (p = 0.004) and fifth (p = 0.031) minutes, than for the second (Table 2). This was also found by Zedini et al [20] and Turan et al [21]. Cheibany [22] in 2016, found a difference only at the fifth minute.…”
Section: Comparison According To Fetal Presentations Apgar Scores Mod...supporting
confidence: 76%
“…APGAR scores seemed better for the first twins at the first (p = 0.004) and fifth (p = 0.031) minutes, than for the second (Table 2). This was also found by Zedini et al [20] and Turan et al [21]. Cheibany [22] in 2016, found a difference only at the fifth minute.…”
Section: Comparison According To Fetal Presentations Apgar Scores Mod...supporting
confidence: 76%