2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11004-011-9373-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Mathematical Methods of Potential Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By replacing probabilities with relative frequencies it must be assumed that all rockfalls are known and the applied methods are thus strongly dependent on the completeness of the inventory (Schaeben, 2012). This is however assumed to be not the case for this study and will thus lead to an underestimation of the prior probability resulting in a bias of the weights as well as the final susceptibility (Agterberg and Cheng, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By replacing probabilities with relative frequencies it must be assumed that all rockfalls are known and the applied methods are thus strongly dependent on the completeness of the inventory (Schaeben, 2012). This is however assumed to be not the case for this study and will thus lead to an underestimation of the prior probability resulting in a bias of the weights as well as the final susceptibility (Agterberg and Cheng, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conditional dependence will lead to an overestimation of the final susceptibility. Based on our experience Weights-of-Evidence is a very powerful method for data exploration, but its application is limited for combining datasets to a susceptibility map due to the multiple assumption of conditional independence (Böhme, 2007;Schaeben, 2012). As logistic regression is closely related to Weights-of-Evidence, but not based on the assumption of conditional independence, this method yields a good alternative in generating susceptibility maps (Hosmer and Lemeshow, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mineral potential modeling, the analytical or empirical relationships between descriptive features and a mineral target express the possibility to predict a given mineral concentration in a location as function of descriptive features (e.g., Quadros et al 2006;Cheng 2008;Zuo and Carranza 2011;Schaeben 2012). Let evidences denote the set of observed features that are directly related to the mineralization process (e.g., mineral alterations in rocks during a hydrothermal event, or sorting of heavy-minerals grains during a depositional process).…”
Section: Curvature and Cu Assessments Potentials Assessments And Predmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, i.e., without assuming conditional independence, the relationship of ordinary logistic regression parameters and the contrast of weights of evidence is clearly non-linear [21,22]; see Appendix 2 for an explicit derivation.…”
Section: Weights-of-evidence Vs Logistic Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%