2021 24th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/wpmc52694.2021.9700469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of MBSFN, SC-PTM and Unicast for Mission Critical Communication

Abstract: Mission Critical Communication (MCC) Services are currently provided through secure and reliable Professional Mobile Radio (PMR) dedicated networks. These services include voice, data and video delivery. During an emergency, timely access to video streaming can increase situational awareness and enhance life-saving operations. Therefore, to improve the capabilities of PMR networks and benefit from the advantages of mutualization, standard cellular technologies based on 4G and 5G were adopted for MCC. In partic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this work does not consider the joint optimization of MBSFN Alloc and MBSFN Period, and also lacks real-time testbed experimentation and analysis. With an end goal of achieving resource allocation efficiency for mission critical communications, MBSFN, SC-PTM and unicast transmissions have been compared in detail in [16]. For emergencies concerning big events and wide-area layouts, MBSFN is better in terms of performance, whereas, SC-PTM is more suitable for emergencies spanning over a smaller scale.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this work does not consider the joint optimization of MBSFN Alloc and MBSFN Period, and also lacks real-time testbed experimentation and analysis. With an end goal of achieving resource allocation efficiency for mission critical communications, MBSFN, SC-PTM and unicast transmissions have been compared in detail in [16]. For emergencies concerning big events and wide-area layouts, MBSFN is better in terms of performance, whereas, SC-PTM is more suitable for emergencies spanning over a smaller scale.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially true when it comes to finding the optimal number of antennas in SC-PTM mode with beamforming and the optimal size of the MB-SFN area. Nevertheless, few works compare MB-SFN mode and SC-PTM mode without beamforming for public safety and critical applications [9,[12][13][14]. In contrast to these works, in our study, we consider that the BS are trisector (each with a 1208 aperture) with antennas capable of using beamforming technology in SC-PTM mode and that the BS are distributed according to a Poisson Point Process (PPP) law instead of the regular hexagonal model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%