2021
DOI: 10.12669/pjms.37.2.3049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of mean operative time in patients undergoing Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy and pneumatic lithotripsy in ureterorenoscopy for ureteric calculus

Abstract: Objective: To compare the mean operative time (MOT) in patients undergoing Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy (LL) and pneumatic lithotripsy (PL) for ureteric stones. Methods: This randomized study was conducted at Armed Forces Institute of Urology (AFIU) Rawalpindi, Pakistan from July 2016 to November 2018. Non probability consecutive sampling technique utilized to enroll 60 patients of both gender aged 18-60 years, having ureteric calculus ≤1.5cm. Randomization was done into group I (LL) and II (PL) via compute… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For calculating lithotripsy, duration there's no standardized method, an RCT compared pneumatic and Ho: YAG Laser and evaluate complete operation time mentioning increased duration in the pneumatic group by 18±3.4 difference between the group. The lithotripter activation time of this study is 32.3±3.8 versus 30.8±3.7 in pneumatic and laser group respectively with a p-value of 0.1, which is like referenced researches 16,17 . Upon dividing the procedure time with stone characteristics to evaluate the variation, the location of stones showed elevated lithotripsy time in proximal ureter with a difference of 10 minutes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…For calculating lithotripsy, duration there's no standardized method, an RCT compared pneumatic and Ho: YAG Laser and evaluate complete operation time mentioning increased duration in the pneumatic group by 18±3.4 difference between the group. The lithotripter activation time of this study is 32.3±3.8 versus 30.8±3.7 in pneumatic and laser group respectively with a p-value of 0.1, which is like referenced researches 16,17 . Upon dividing the procedure time with stone characteristics to evaluate the variation, the location of stones showed elevated lithotripsy time in proximal ureter with a difference of 10 minutes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Ultrasoundguided PCNL has the advantages of higher success rate of single needle puncture, fewer puncture times and shorter puncture time. 21 Lazarus et al 22 believed that ultrasound guided puncture could significantly reduce the puncture time and the number of puncture statistically. It was confirmed in our study that compared with X-ray guidance, ultrasound-guided PCNL significantly reduced the operation time, channel establishment time, channel number and blood loss (p<0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasound-guided PCNL has the advantages of higher success rate of single needle puncture, fewer puncture times and shorter puncture time. 21 Lazarus et al 22 believed that ultrasound guided puncture could significantly reduce the puncture time and the number of puncture statistically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…General anesthesia per se (induced by inhaled anesthetics) increased Aβ production and aggregation, and tau accumulation (Run et al, 2009;Perucho et al, 2010), and inhibited the activities of cholinergic neurons in preclinical studies (Luo et al, 2020). However, clinical studies found no evidence that general anesthesia increased POCD, compared to non-general anesthesia (neuraxial, regional and local anesthesia; Mason et al, 2010;Silbert et al, 2014). Usually, anesthesia is followed by surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%