2000
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.338-342.841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Mechanical and Chemomechanical Polished SiC Wafers Using Photon Backscattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[12,13] In addition, electrically active near surface defects have also been observed. [14] The situation is such that surface and subsurface quality is often regarded as a limiting factor in the production of high quality SiC based devices.…”
Section: B) Silicon Carbide Sensor Research At West Virginia Universitymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…[12,13] In addition, electrically active near surface defects have also been observed. [14] The situation is such that surface and subsurface quality is often regarded as a limiting factor in the production of high quality SiC based devices.…”
Section: B) Silicon Carbide Sensor Research At West Virginia Universitymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Their atomic force microscopy studies demonstrated that scratch-free surfaces could be produced with CMP. Mitchel et al 12 used a similar process and achieved scratch and damage free surfaces on vicinal 4H-SiC wafers. However, there have been no studies of epitaxial growth of SiC on CMP prepared wafers reported to date that the authors are aware of.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…10 Chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) has been used for some time to prepare damage free surfaces for silicon and gallium arsenide and is under development for SiC. 11,12 CMP is believed to be under development by several wafer suppliers but their processes are proprietary. Zhou et al 11 have demonstrated a collodial silica based CMP for SiC and achieved removal of the subsurface damage layer present in as-received wafers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] There are also reports on the quality of epi-films investigated from the view-point of surface preparation before starting the epi-film growth. 18,19) However, most of those works are based on the assumption that damage is introduced uniformly on the wafer surface, but not locally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%