Comparison of melt evolution and flow mechanisms of Inconel 718, Ti6Al4V, 304 stainless steel, and AlSi10Mg manufactured by laser powder bed fusion, structures, and properties after heat treatments

Lü, Haitao; Pan, Jiajing; Gu, Yu; Xiao, Junyi; Ma, Chenhui; Yu, Nan; Li, Huimin

doi:10.1016/j.msea.2023.144649

Cited by 17 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In contrast, additive manufacturing, e.g., in the form of laser beam sintering of powders, produces complex multiphase ratios at the sintering site where the solid phase, the gas phase, and the molten phase coexist. This condition, together with the high cooling gradients and reflow of the material layers as the beam passes through the new added layer, is not yet clearly described physically [ 9 , 11 , 12 ]. Therefore, the strength of the bonds formed may not automatically be the same when comparing AM production and conventional metallurgy.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Strength and Cyclic Properties of Additive vs. Conventionally Produced Material AlSi10Mg

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Additive metals are practically identical in strength to the properties of conventionally produced materials. This article experimentally analyses strength properties and fatigue properties in the tensile–pressure mode for two different directions of 3D printing of AlSi10Mg material. The resulting fatigue parameters of the Basquin curve are confronted with a conventionally produced alloy of the same composition. The microstructure analysis explains the different fatigue properties obtained by these two material production technologies. Phenomena such as strength enhancement in additive manufacturing material, anisotropy of cyclic properties, and cyclic hardening are discussed. The limits of current additive manufacturing are clarified, and the future direction of research in this field is outlined.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%