2018
DOI: 10.2131/jts.43.459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of mercury and methylmercury bioaccumulation in earthworms (<i>Bimastus parvus</i>) native to landfill-leachate-contaminated forest soil

Abstract: Total mercury (THg) and methylmercury (MeHg) bioaccumulation was explored in the Bimastus parvus species of earthworm (B. parvus) native to the leachate-contaminated forest soils around a Hg-polluted traditional landfill in Japan. General soil properties and concentrations of THg and MeHg in forest soils and in B. parvus were determined. The results indicated that the average THg concentrations in B. parvus and in forest soils in the leachate-contaminated sites were 10.21 and 14.90 times higher than those in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pH of the soil samples ranged from 4.14 to 6.16, 3.26 to 4.68, 4.27 to 6.32 and 3.38 to 4.64 in D1, D2, D3 and D4, respectively. Similar results were recorded by He et al [13] with pH ranged from 4.08 to 5.67 in forest soils. Low soil pH promotes metal solubility and their availability to plants which emphasizes it as an important factor in metal uptake [14,15].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pH of the soil samples ranged from 4.14 to 6.16, 3.26 to 4.68, 4.27 to 6.32 and 3.38 to 4.64 in D1, D2, D3 and D4, respectively. Similar results were recorded by He et al [13] with pH ranged from 4.08 to 5.67 in forest soils. Low soil pH promotes metal solubility and their availability to plants which emphasizes it as an important factor in metal uptake [14,15].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The total mercury of the samples ranged from 0.24 to 3.80, 0.84 to 1.55, 0.45 to 1.67 and 0.19 to 4.97 mg kg -1 in D1, D2, D3 and D4, respectively whereas the water soluble mercury fraction ranged from 0.01 to 0.07 and 0.01 to 0.04 mg kg -1 in D1 and D4, respectively corresponding to 0.5 to 5.36 % of the total. These results were correlated with the findings of He et al [13] and Rieder et al [21]. The soil mercury content recorded was less than the prescribed permissible limit by Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines which holds 6.6 mg kg -1 for residential as well as agricultural area and 50 mg kg -1 for industrial area [22].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The direct impact of Hg on the earthworms' biomass might have been outweighed by the rich soil quality in experiment 1 and the poor quality in experiment 2. However, the accumulation of both THg and MeHg in the earthworms compared with in the soil matrix was considerable in both experiments, in line with observations from previous field studies of a correlation between Hg bioaccumulation and soil total Hg, organic matter and clay contents [23,27,48]. Furthermore, the Hg and MeHg bioaccumulation might have affected the earthworms over a longer period than the incubation duration, for example by impacting their burrowing behavior or respiration [49].…”
Section: Hg Contamination In Soils and Its Effect On Earthwormssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In this study, we demonstrated the impact of Hg contamination and accumulation in earthworms using long-term Hg-contaminated soils [24]. Whereas laboratory experiments using Hg-spiked soil often aim for concentrations of up to 500 mg kg −1 [4,47], the total Hg concentrations in our incubated soils (36 mg kg −1 ) were in the range of total Hg concentrations found in other Hg-polluted sites, such as in a leachate-contaminated soil (THg 1.3 µg g −1 dw, [48]) or a landfill (THg 0.9-97.5 µg g −1 , [23]).…”
Section: Hg Contamination In Soils and Its Effect On Earthwormsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There are many studies of bacteria that show potential in the removal of Hg from contaminated water, however, in general terms, the bioremediation of soils contaminated by Hg has been little investigated [33,37,38]. Added to this is the use of native bacteria, as some microorganisms develop resistance to Hg contamination, making them promising natural candidates for bioremediation [39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%