2021
DOI: 10.3390/nano12010147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Metal-Based Nanoparticles and Nanowires: Solubility, Reactivity, Bioavailability and Cellular Toxicity

Abstract: While the toxicity of metal-based nanoparticles (NP) has been investigated in an increasing number of studies, little is known about metal-based fibrous materials, so-called nanowires (NWs). Within the present study, the physico-chemical properties of particulate and fibrous nanomaterials based on Cu, CuO, Ni, and Ag as well as TiO2 and CeO2 NP were characterized and compared with respect to abiotic metal ion release in different physiologically relevant media as well as acellular reactivity. While none of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The minimum detectable size was 12 nm so that 97% of the CeO 2 NM212 particles detected by TEM could be determined by (LA)–spICP–MS. The size distributions obtained by (LA)–spICP–MS were slightly broader than those determined from the micrograph most likely resulting from slight CeO 2 NM212 aggregates/agglomerates, as present in aqueous media . The mean particle size and the size distribution obtained by LA–spICP–MS compared to pneumatic nebulizer-based spICP–MS were in good agreement, supporting the fact that the particles did not undergo fragmentation during the LA.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The minimum detectable size was 12 nm so that 97% of the CeO 2 NM212 particles detected by TEM could be determined by (LA)–spICP–MS. The size distributions obtained by (LA)–spICP–MS were slightly broader than those determined from the micrograph most likely resulting from slight CeO 2 NM212 aggregates/agglomerates, as present in aqueous media . The mean particle size and the size distribution obtained by LA–spICP–MS compared to pneumatic nebulizer-based spICP–MS were in good agreement, supporting the fact that the particles did not undergo fragmentation during the LA.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The size distributions obtained by (LA)−spICP−MS were slightly broader than those determined from the micrograph most likely resulting from slight CeO 2 NM212 aggregates/agglomerates, as present in aqueous media. 38 The mean particle size and the size distribution obtained by LA−spICP−MS compared to pneumatic nebulizer-based spICP−MS were in good agreement, supporting the fact that the particles did not undergo fragmentation . For LA−spICP−MS analysis, the particle mass was determined using liquid calibration with dissolved metal standards, and the particle size was determined assuming a cubic shape.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, therefore, we aimed to obtain toxicity profiles for all three particles and to compare them with water-soluble Cr(VI) and Cr(III). To this end, we applied gene expression analyses using high-throughput RT-qPCR, established previously in our group using the BioMark HD system [11], and which has been used successfully for metal-based nanomaterials, both after submersed and air-liquid interface (ALI) exposure [16][17][18]. This method enables the parallel investigation of 96 samples with regard to their impact on 95 genes of interest.…”
Section: Gene Expression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many studies on nanotoxicity are produced every year [23,24,[34][35][36][37][38], the mechanisms that trigger cytotoxicity are not yet fully elucidated. Moreover, the cellular effects of NPs are dependent on several factors, such as particle size, surface ligands, their agglomeration state, as well as the dose and exposure time in addition to the cell line being studied [3,22,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%