2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10333-011-0279-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of methanotrophic bacteria, methane oxidation activity, and methane emission in rice fields fertilized with anaerobically digested slurry between a fodder rice and a normal rice variety

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such seasonal patterns were typical for CH 4 metabolism in paddy fields, especially for the overall CH 4 emission, with similar findings reported in Italy[38], Japan[39], and northeastern China[40]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Such seasonal patterns were typical for CH 4 metabolism in paddy fields, especially for the overall CH 4 emission, with similar findings reported in Italy[38], Japan[39], and northeastern China[40]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This was consistent with the report of neue and Roger (1993), who found large differences in methane emissions due to different root oxidizing power among rice cultivars. In fact, root exudates constitute an organic substrate for microbial organisms that could be utilized for methane production and oxidation by methanogens and methanotrophs, respectively (Win et al 2012). Frenzel et al (1992) reported that 80-90% of the methane produced in the rhizosphere was re-oxidized.…”
Section: Differences In Methane Emission Among Rice Cultivarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the total methane emitted from a rice field during the growing season, 60-90% is transported through the rice plants rather than through molecular diffusion across water-air interfaces or through the release of gas bubbles (Holzapfel-Pschorn et al 1986;Schütz et al 1989;. Rice plant have three key functions regulating the methane budget (Setyanto et al 2004;Zheng et al 2013): (1) as a source of methanogenic substrate through root exudates and/or dead root cells Kerdchoechuen 2005); (2) as a channel for methane through well-developed intercellular air spaces (aerenchyma) in leaf blades, leaf sheaths, culms and roots of rice plants, which provide an effective channel for gas exchange (methane transport capacity (MTC)) between the atmosphere and the anaerobic soil (Raskin & Kende 1985;Butterbach-Bahl et al 1997;Shao & Li 1997;Aulakh et al 2000;Fu et al 2007);and (3) as an active methane oxidizing site in the rice rhizosphere by supporting oxygen counter transport through the aerenchyma system (Win et al 2012;Gutierrez et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the number of plant tillers, plant above and belowground biomass (Sinha 1995;Setyanto et al, 2004;Khosa et al, 2010). Other mechanisms that may in uence observed genotypic variations in CH 4 emissions include differences in (1) root exudates, which represent methanogenic substrate (Kerdchoechuen, 2005); (2) the development of aerenchyma (Aulakh et al 2000); and (3) the size of methane-oxidizing sites in the rhizosphere (Win et al, 2012;Gutierrez et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%