2014
DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Methodologies to Quantify Phytate Phosphorus in Diets Containing Phytase and Excreta from Broilers

Abstract: The use of a suitable methodology to quantify the phytate phosphorus (Pphy) content in both the feed and the excreta from broilers is required to enable accurate calculation of the catalytic efficiency of the phytase supplemented in the feed. This study was conducted to compare 2 analytical methodologies (colorimetry and also high-performance liquid chromatography with a refractive index detector) in order to calculate the phytase efficiency by utilizing the results from the methodology that was shown to be th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phytases evaluated in the present study were added to the feed at a concentration of 1500 units of phytase activity (FTU)/kg because in a previous metabolism assay, Naves et al (2014b) concluded that when the broiler feed was supplemented with increasing levels of 6-phytase (0, 750, 1500 and 2250 FTU/kg), the greatest PP retention coefficient (88.45%) was determined when the feed contained 1500 FTU/ kg. Therefore, the following microbial phytases were added at a concentration of 1500 FTU/kg of feed: phytase A (6-phytase ® expressed by genetically modified Aspergillus oryzae with two synthetic genes derived from the gene encoding phytase ATCC 51113 in Citrobacter braakii), phytase B (6-phytase ® produced by A. oryzae that was genetically modified with the phytase gene from Peniophora lycii), phytase C (6-phytase ® produced by Schizosaccharomyces pombe ATCC 5233 that was genetically modified with the phytase gene from Escherichia coli), phytase D (a second-generation genetic improvement of the 6-phytase ® produced by E.coli), phytase E (the first generation of the genetic improvement of the 6-phytase ® produced by E.coli) and phytase F ('wild-type' 6-phytase ® produced by E. coli).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The phytases evaluated in the present study were added to the feed at a concentration of 1500 units of phytase activity (FTU)/kg because in a previous metabolism assay, Naves et al (2014b) concluded that when the broiler feed was supplemented with increasing levels of 6-phytase (0, 750, 1500 and 2250 FTU/kg), the greatest PP retention coefficient (88.45%) was determined when the feed contained 1500 FTU/ kg. Therefore, the following microbial phytases were added at a concentration of 1500 FTU/kg of feed: phytase A (6-phytase ® expressed by genetically modified Aspergillus oryzae with two synthetic genes derived from the gene encoding phytase ATCC 51113 in Citrobacter braakii), phytase B (6-phytase ® produced by A. oryzae that was genetically modified with the phytase gene from Peniophora lycii), phytase C (6-phytase ® produced by Schizosaccharomyces pombe ATCC 5233 that was genetically modified with the phytase gene from Escherichia coli), phytase D (a second-generation genetic improvement of the 6-phytase ® produced by E.coli), phytase E (the first generation of the genetic improvement of the 6-phytase ® produced by E.coli) and phytase F ('wild-type' 6-phytase ® produced by E. coli).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Gross energy was determined in a bomb calorimeter (model 1261, Parr Instrument Company, Moline, IL). The concentration of PP was determined by the colorimetric method with a 1:20 extraction ratio as described by Naves et al (2014b). In parallel, three homogeneous aliquots of each experimental diet were collected, ground and stored until the same chemical analyses that were conducted for the excreta were performed.…”
Section: Balance and Retention Of Nutrientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mixture was centrifuged at 6000× g and 10 °C, and the absorbance was then read at 500 nm using a Cary 60 UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). A calibration curve was prepared by different concentrations of phytic acid (Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) and the results were multiplied by 0.282 (molar ratio of phytate - phosphorus in a molecule of phytate) in order to express the phytate content in the sample as mg g −1 of phytic acid on dry matter [7].…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this time, the contents were weighed, homogenized and pre‐dried in an oven at 55 °C for 72 h. After pre‐drying, the excreta were ground and stored at room temperature until that the analyses of dry matter (DM), total P, Ca, nitrogen (N) and gross energy were performed (AOAC, ). The concentration of phytate phosphorus (P phyt ) was determined by the colorimetric method with a 1:20 extraction ratio as described by Naves (). In parallel, three homogeneous aliquots of each experimental diet were collected, ground and stored until the same chemical analyses as the ones that were performed on the excreta were performed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%