2005
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-68.4.801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Methods for Assessing Reverse Osmosis Membrane Treatment of Shrimp Process Water

Abstract: Interest in reuse of process water from the food industry has reinforced the importance of controlling and monitoring the effectiveness and reliability of treatment systems regarding removal of organic matter and microorganisms. The ability of adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence, conductivity, turbidometry, absorbance, and multichannel fluorescence spectroscopy for indirectly monitoring the integrity of a reverse osmosis membrane when treating process water recovered from peeling in a shrimp processing line… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some reports suggest that VDT results correlate well with virus and total organic carbon (TOC) rejection by RO membranes and it is therefore a potentially useful integrity screening procedure for RO membrane elements [ 6 ]. Since the test is applied directly to membrane elements, the VDT cannot be performed when filtration is taking place [ 16 ] and thus does not enable real-time membrane integrity monitoring in the strictest sense but could allow frequent monitoring to identify slow degradation of system integrity.…”
Section: Direct Integrity Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, some reports suggest that VDT results correlate well with virus and total organic carbon (TOC) rejection by RO membranes and it is therefore a potentially useful integrity screening procedure for RO membrane elements [ 6 ]. Since the test is applied directly to membrane elements, the VDT cannot be performed when filtration is taking place [ 16 ] and thus does not enable real-time membrane integrity monitoring in the strictest sense but could allow frequent monitoring to identify slow degradation of system integrity.…”
Section: Direct Integrity Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several integrity monitoring techniques have been developed for these systems and they are broadly classified into direct and indirect techniques [ 6 , 15 ]. In general, direct methods assess the integrity of membrane elements by the application of a pressure-based test whereas indirect methods use a surrogate parameter measured in the permeate for assessing the integrity of the whole membrane system [ 6 , 16 , 17 ]. Direct tests are usually performed offline on individual elements but indirect tests can be performed on membranes during service and have a wider scope for online continuous monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Minimisation of the microbial risks associated with food process water treatment and reuse is ensured by guaranteeing an optimal performance of the treatment process and verifying filter or systems failures (Alspach, 2002). On-line monitoring of the microbiological quality of the treated water is not feasible, and the use of indirect methods is, therefore, recommended (Casani & Knøchel, 2002) The potential of various methods, i.e., Adenosine Triphosphate bioluminescence (ATP), conductivity, turbidometry, absorbance and multichannel fluorescence spectroscopy, for assessing at-line the integrity of the RO system was investigated (Casani, Hansen, Christensen, & Knøchel, 2005). ATP content showed a better correlation with aerobic count at levels close to those required for recycling and a higher sensitivity for detecting compromising conditions at the treatment system than the other methods investigated.…”
Section: Establishment Of Critical Limits and Monitoring Procedures Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the continuous RO system (34)(35)(36), the centrifuge effluent is divided into two streams: (a) the RO permeate amounting to about 90 m 3 of water; and (b) the RO retentate having 8% TS and about 90 m 3 of water. The RO permeate is recycled to the grinding operation for reuse, while the RO retentate is treated by steam heat, coagulation, and mechanical separation, which is then dried as a high grade protein concentrate (protomyl PF) that can be used as animal feed for small animals, such as piglets, poultry, dogs, cats, minks, etc.…”
Section: Recovery Of Potato Starch Effluent Using Romentioning
confidence: 99%