2020
DOI: 10.3390/ijms21207626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Methods for Bulk Automated Simulation of Glycosidic Bond Conformations

Abstract: Six empirical force fields were tested for applicability to calculations for automated carbohydrate database filling. They were probed on eleven disaccharide molecules containing representative structural features from widespread classes of carbohydrates. The accuracy of each method was queried by predictions of nuclear Overhauser effects (NOEs) from conformational ensembles obtained from 50 to 100 ns molecular dynamics (MD) trajectories and their comparison to the published experimental data. Using various ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimates of C-NMR parameters , and the NOE for selected CH and CH probes were calculated by SALEM starting from a local-minimum structure ( Figure 2 , Figure 3 , Figure 4 , Figure 5 , Figure 6 and Figure 7 ) and the related Hessian matrix. These were obtained through the Tinker 8 program package [ 27 ] using the popular MM3 FF [ 33 , 34 , 35 ] (see References [ 36 , 37 ] for a review of several FFs for carbohydrates). Minimization was performed through the minimize tool of Tinker with an “RMS gradient per atom criterion” of 0.01 Å.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of C-NMR parameters , and the NOE for selected CH and CH probes were calculated by SALEM starting from a local-minimum structure ( Figure 2 , Figure 3 , Figure 4 , Figure 5 , Figure 6 and Figure 7 ) and the related Hessian matrix. These were obtained through the Tinker 8 program package [ 27 ] using the popular MM3 FF [ 33 , 34 , 35 ] (see References [ 36 , 37 ] for a review of several FFs for carbohydrates). Minimization was performed through the minimize tool of Tinker with an “RMS gradient per atom criterion” of 0.01 Å.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For seven of eleven molecules, at least one empirical force field with explicit solvent outperformed DFT in NOE prediction. The aggregate of characteristics (accuracy, speed, and compatibility) made MM3 dynamics with an explicit solvent at 300 K the most favorable method for bulk generation of disaccharide conformation maps for massive database filling [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%