2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00193-009-0230-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of methods for calculating the shock hugoniot of mixtures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the Hugoniots of solid diopside to 179 GPa [single crystal data of Svendsen and Ahrens , 1983] and solid anorthite to 100 GPa [polycrystalline anorthosite data of Mcqueen et al , 1967] each define linear high‐pressure phase regimes. The Hugoniot of mixtures by kinetic‐energy averaging theory of Batsanov [1994] has been found to be accurate to <1% (even for such disparate materials as tungsten and paraffin [ Petel and Jette , 2010]); this model predicts the particle velocity of solid Di 64 An 36 at P = 133.45 GPa to be u p = 4.322 km s −1 , whereas the observed result in Shot 368 is u p = 4.211 ± 0.016 km s −1 . The difference of over six standard deviations is highly significant and tends to exclude the hypothesis that the shock state in 368 is a solid aggregate of anorthite and diopside.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the Hugoniots of solid diopside to 179 GPa [single crystal data of Svendsen and Ahrens , 1983] and solid anorthite to 100 GPa [polycrystalline anorthosite data of Mcqueen et al , 1967] each define linear high‐pressure phase regimes. The Hugoniot of mixtures by kinetic‐energy averaging theory of Batsanov [1994] has been found to be accurate to <1% (even for such disparate materials as tungsten and paraffin [ Petel and Jette , 2010]); this model predicts the particle velocity of solid Di 64 An 36 at P = 133.45 GPa to be u p = 4.322 km s −1 , whereas the observed result in Shot 368 is u p = 4.211 ± 0.016 km s −1 . The difference of over six standard deviations is highly significant and tends to exclude the hypothesis that the shock state in 368 is a solid aggregate of anorthite and diopside.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental data [8] for aluminum nitride AlN (initial density 3.23 g/cm 3 ) and the data [9] for silicon nitride Si3N4 (initial density 3.44 g/cm 3 ) are used in the calculations of the shock wave loading of these materials with the phase transition.…”
Section: áBra Lökéshullám Adiabata Vonalak Kvarc-volfrám Keverékre (1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. Shock adiabats of silicon nitride (1) and nitride of aluminum (2) The results for the mixture of AlN and Si3N4 with equal volume fractions and initial density 3.335 g/cm 3 are shown in Fig. 3.b.…”
Section: áBra Lökéshullám Adiabata Vonalak Kvarc-volfrám Keverékre (1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[22,23], and the mixture method recommended by Ref. [24], assuming zero porosity (i.e., 100 % TMD). The porous Hugoniot was then obtained using the method in Ref.…”
Section: Quantification Of Shock Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%