1977
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.5450550104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of methods for measuring interfacial areas in gas‐liquid dispersions

Abstract: Interfacial areas were determined for gas‐liquid systems in a column with transparent walls by the chemical and two physical methods: photography and light attenuation. The advantages of the different methods are discussed and improvements in the physical methods are described. By using a Data Tablet Digitizer, the photographic technique provides additional information on the gas dispersion without increasing the amount of work needed for analysis of the photographs. Use of the light attenuation technique is e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The chemical method is applicable to all flow regimes and is apparently the only method which does not require verification by another measurement technique (Landau et al, 1977). One of the main drawbacks at present of all but the last method is the restriction to one or two flow regimes, namely bubbly and/or slug.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical method is applicable to all flow regimes and is apparently the only method which does not require verification by another measurement technique (Landau et al, 1977). One of the main drawbacks at present of all but the last method is the restriction to one or two flow regimes, namely bubbly and/or slug.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the light attenuation technique yields an average value representative of the conditions across its path length, the photographic technique emphasizes the regions near the wall (Landau et al, 1977 b). This may well explain the small but systematic deviation between the two techniques which was observed to occur in the bubble column when gas holdups larger than 5 % were obtained using large bubbles (Q2 1 2.0 mm, Figure 5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the measurement of S in gas liquid reactions, commonly used methods include light scattering techniques and chemical methods. The light scattering method can be used in systems where gas is in the dispersed phase [35,46,70,71]. In the chemical method, a gas liquid reaction system with known kinetics is considered [72].…”
Section: Instrumental Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%