1982
DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(82)90084-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of methods of recording and analysis of Doppler blood velocity signals in normal subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assumed that the Doppler intercept angle was 180° to the direction of flow. This is consistent with previous methodology [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introduction Methodssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…We assumed that the Doppler intercept angle was 180° to the direction of flow. This is consistent with previous methodology [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introduction Methodssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…We assumed that the Doppler intercept angle was 180° to the direction of flow. This is consistent with previous meth odology [13][14][15]. The system provides an internally derived beat- …”
supporting
confidence: 73%
“…[24][25][26] We recorded Doppler signals from three arterial sites in which the ultrasound beam could be aimed close to the axis of flow in the vessel. This device has a transducer with a diameter of 0.8 cm and a far field beam divergence of about 12 degrees.…”
Section: Experimental Data Acquisition Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%