2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2018.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of methods to assess the integrity and separation efficiency of ultrafiltration membranes in wastewater reclamation processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pore size of UF membranes is much smaller than the length or width of individual cells, therefore theoretically even single cells should not be observed in the permeate. Nevertheless, the presence of prokaryotic cells in the permeate after UF is indicated by many authors [ 31 , 46 , 80 , 81 ]. Membrane pores smaller that the cell sizes could be penetrated by microorganisms due to their pressure deformation [ 46 , 80 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pore size of UF membranes is much smaller than the length or width of individual cells, therefore theoretically even single cells should not be observed in the permeate. Nevertheless, the presence of prokaryotic cells in the permeate after UF is indicated by many authors [ 31 , 46 , 80 , 81 ]. Membrane pores smaller that the cell sizes could be penetrated by microorganisms due to their pressure deformation [ 46 , 80 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 In addition to chemical parameters, microbial contaminants have been used to monitor the membrane integrity. Plate counting of bacteria, such as Escherichia coli (E. coli), is considered the conventional approach 2,25 While being an effective indicator, the application of plate counting is limited by the significant time delay between sampling and the result. 25 Next to plate counting, flow cytometry (FCM) has been considered an alternative for water quality monitoring.…”
Section: Lastly Abrasion By Particulates and Sharp Objects In The Feedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ultrafiltration, Khahnstover et al [ 177 ] published a comparison of different methods that can be used to assess integrity and separation efficiency. Nanoparticle counting was found to be the most sensitive method overall in terms of lowest LRV values reported.…”
Section: Wastewater Treatment For Virus Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%