1996
DOI: 10.1006/fmic.1996.0036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of methods to determine the microbiological contamination of surfaces of beef carcasses by hydrophobic grid membrane filters, standard pour plates or flow cytometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hide surfaces have been recognized as significant sources of micro‐organisms, with counts as high as 9·0 log 10 CFU cm −2 being reported (Jericho et al. 1996b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hide surfaces have been recognized as significant sources of micro‐organisms, with counts as high as 9·0 log 10 CFU cm −2 being reported (Jericho et al. 1996b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hide surfaces have been recognized as significant sources of micro-organisms, with counts as high as 9AE0 log 10 CFU cm )2 being reported (Jericho et al 1996b). With such high numbers of micro-organisms present it is highly likely that a proportion of this microflora will be transferred to carcass surfaces during dressing operations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2000). Hides have been reported as significant sources of soil and faecal material, with counts as high as 9·0 log 10 CFU cm −2 observed (Jericho et al. 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microbiological conditions of meat derived from livestock depend upon the types of microorganisms carried on the hide, gastrointestinal tract or systemic organs, the circumstances in which the animal is slaughtered and abattoir hygiene whereas the microflora that develops after dressing is influenced by the storage conditions and its intrinsic biochemical qualities (Bacon et al, 2000;Gill, 2007;Jericho, Kozub, Loewen, & Ho, 1996;McCleery, Stirling, Mclvor, & Patterson, 2008;Newton et al, 1978;Small, Reid, & Buncic, 2003). In general, hide surfaces are significant sources of microorganisms with total microbial counts for cattle hides ranging from 3.53 to 12.50 log 10 cfu/cm 2 , E. coli levels from 2.08 to 7.50 log 10 cfu/cm 2 , and 5.38 log 10 cfu/cm 2 on sheep fleece (Cox et al, 1988;Gabis & Faust, 1988;McCleery et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%