2013
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.12572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Methods to Measure Height in Older Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, physical activity was not measured objectively, such as using an accelerometer, and sedentary leisure time activities as well as sleep habits were not measured either. Thirdly, height was measured using a stadiometer, which is the established gold standard, but this assessment may not be feasible for studies conducted in elderly populations with mobility limitations [ 57 ]. Fourthly, the macronutrient intake was estimated using recall diets instead of food frequency questionnaires that have been questioned in epidemiological studies [ 58 , 59 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, physical activity was not measured objectively, such as using an accelerometer, and sedentary leisure time activities as well as sleep habits were not measured either. Thirdly, height was measured using a stadiometer, which is the established gold standard, but this assessment may not be feasible for studies conducted in elderly populations with mobility limitations [ 57 ]. Fourthly, the macronutrient intake was estimated using recall diets instead of food frequency questionnaires that have been questioned in epidemiological studies [ 58 , 59 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both WHR and BMI correlate, for example, with age‐related macular degeneration (e.g., Seddon, Cote, Davis, & Rosner, 2003). To secure inter‐individual comparability, a portable stadiometer is recommended: these can be folded up and guarantee a uniformity of measurement across subjects: see e.g., Gordon, Fredman, Orwig, and Alley (2013, p. 2244) for the stadiometer being the ‘golden standard’ to measure height. The costs of a portable stadiometer are relatively low.…”
Section: Establishing Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the study progressed, pragmatic solutions that were negotiated included taking a participant’s height against a doorpost with a tape measure (doorposts provided support for those with poor balance and were more readily accessible than wall space) ( n = 13) [ 17 ]. If the participants were bed-bound, recumbent length measurements ( n = 5) were attempted, but this requires someone else to assist and the participant to lie flat, which may be contraindicated due to the weight on their chest compromising breathing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%