2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of metrics for the evaluation of medical segmentations using prostate MRI dataset

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The batch size was initialized to 8. After training, the test set was applied to the trained model and the segmentation performance was compared to the ground truth using the dice similarity coefficient [ 35 ] as metric.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The batch size was initialized to 8. After training, the test set was applied to the trained model and the segmentation performance was compared to the ground truth using the dice similarity coefficient [ 35 ] as metric.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where |.| represents the size of a mask. ASSD evaluates the closeness between the algorithm and manual segmentation boundaries and is given as: 1 2 Please note that traditional classification accuracy metrics, including true/false positives, true/false negatives and their combinations, can also be used to evaluate image segmentation accuracies [32] and DSC can be derived based on the four basic cardinalities when evaluating Boolean data. In fact, DSC, ASSD, and volume errors are widely used overlap, volume, and distance-based metrics for comprehensive evaluation of segmentation algorithms [33], and here we adopted the same or similar metrics consistent with most image segmentation studies.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medical images are infamous in the field of image segmentation due to their extensive class imbalance [ 10 , 17 ]. Usually, an image in medicine contains a single ROI taking only a small percentage of pixels in the image, whereas the remaining image is all annotated as background.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially in more complex and granular segmentation tasks, exact contour prediction is highly important which is why HD based evaluations have become popular in the field of MIS [ 10 ]. However, because the HD is sensitive to outliers, the symmetric Average Hausdorff Distance (AHD) is utilized in the majority of applications instead [ 10 , 17 , 46 ]. The symmetric AHD is defined by the maximum between the directed average Hausdorff distance d(A,B) and its reverse direction d(B,A) in which A and B represent the ground truth and predicted segmentation, respectively, and ||a-b|| represents a distance function like Euclidean distance [ 10 ]: …”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation