2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of microbial communities of activated sludge and membrane biofilm in 10 full-scale membrane bioreactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
39
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
10
39
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, our results are in good agreement with a previous study, wherein the microbial communities of sludge and membrane biofilm of 10 full scale MBRs were compared (Jo et al, 2016). Although, there are differences in the relative abundance of bacterial groups in the sludge and the biofilm, the microbial community is largely similar in both samples.…”
Section: Microbial Communitysupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, our results are in good agreement with a previous study, wherein the microbial communities of sludge and membrane biofilm of 10 full scale MBRs were compared (Jo et al, 2016). Although, there are differences in the relative abundance of bacterial groups in the sludge and the biofilm, the microbial community is largely similar in both samples.…”
Section: Microbial Communitysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Also, they have the ability to spread rapidly to form monolayers of cells on the surfaces, which can develop into multicellular mushroom shaped structures (Tsang et al, 2006). Furthermore, Flavobacteriia that contribute in flocs and biofilm formation were double in the biofilm community as compared to the sludge (Jo et al, 2016) (E-supplementary data of this work can be found in online version of the paper). Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Planctomycetes and Chloroflexi were found to be the dominant bacterial phyla in both sludge and membrane biofilm communities (Jo et al, 2016;Lim et al, 2012;Ziegler et al, 2016).…”
Section: Microbial Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The species in this genus could also be isolated from diseased fish, domestic drain conduits, and potable dental lines [26]. Recently, Jo et al [27] reported that it could be abundantly present in full-scale membrane bioreactors. These results suggested that this genus probably prefers biofilm environments and may contribute to biofilmformation.…”
Section: Bacterial Community Shift In the Od System During Startupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, very little is known about differences (if any) in viral composition between common wastewater treatment process variations, particularly between systems that use suspended versus attached bacterial growth for secondary treatment. Differences could result from the fact that WWTPs using biofilm and suspended growth forms of secondary treatment can contain microbial communities that collectively achieve similar outcomes for nutrient removal, but relative abundances of specific bacterial taxa tend to vary across different types of WWTPs (Wagner and Loy, 2002;Jo et al, 2016). Some viruses correspond to specific host taxa, thus the bacterial community composition may influence viral community structure, and simultaneously, viruses can influence bacterial communities by causing bacterial mortality (Fuhrman and Schwalbach, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%