1995
DOI: 10.1016/0377-8401(95)98202-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of microbial fermentation in the rumen of dairy cows and dual flow continuous culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
45
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
10
45
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Visual observation supported the loss of protozoa; decreases in protozoa have previously been observed in our system (Mansfield et al, 1995) and in other rumen models (Slyter et al, 1964;Prevot et al, 1995). The most striking population change that occurred during the initial fermenter runs was the decreased Eukarya.…”
Section: System Stabilitysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Visual observation supported the loss of protozoa; decreases in protozoa have previously been observed in our system (Mansfield et al, 1995) and in other rumen models (Slyter et al, 1964;Prevot et al, 1995). The most striking population change that occurred during the initial fermenter runs was the decreased Eukarya.…”
Section: System Stabilitysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Czerkawski et al (1966) found CH 4 reduction (27, 26 and 34%) caused by the infusion of 60 g/day of OA, LA and ALA, respectively, into the rumen of sheep fed dried hay. The ammonia concentration depends on ammonia use and release by a microbial population (Mansfield et al, 1995). Our results showed a decrease in NH 3 -N concentration in the effluent after FA supplementation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…These results and those of pH would indicate that a more stable fermentation took place in fermenters compared to that in vivo. Finally, although higher VFA concentrations could be expected in the in vitro systems compared to in vivo because of the lack of absorption in the former (Mansfield et al, 1995), in the present study total VFA concentrations in SFCCF were similar to those in vivo (128 and 119 mmol/l for diets F80 and F20, respectively; Carro et al, 2000), but Rusitec fermenters showed lower values with both diets. The higher 'feed/ruminal liquid' ratio used in SFCCF compared to that in Rusitec could partially explain the lower VFA concentrations found in Rusitec fermenters.…”
Section: Comparison Of In Vitro Systemscontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…Although both types of fermenters are used in many laboratories, there is no standardization among systems and direct comparisons between them have not been, to date, carried out. In addition, comparisons between in vivo -E-mail: mdcart@unileon.es and in vitro rumen fermentation are limited, and to the best of our knowledge all of them have been conducted in cows (Hannah et al, 1986;Mansfield et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%