2015
DOI: 10.7589/2014-10-244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COMPARISON OF MODIFIED FLOTAC AND BAERMANN TECHNIQUES FOR QUANTIFYING LUNGWORM LARVAE IN FREE-RANGING BIGHORN SHEEP (OVIS CANADENSIS) FECES, MONTANA, USA

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Lungworms are important parasites of wildlife and host infection status is often evaluated using coprologic techniques, most commonly the Baermann method. Recently, the FLOTACH has emerged as a new tool for diagnosing lungworm infections, and methodologic comparison studies in domestic species suggest that this method outperforms many other established techniques. We compared a modified FLOTAC with the beaker-modified (bm)-Baermann to evaluate the relative performance of the two techniques for countin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the Baermann technique, FLOTAC cuts down the time for sample processing and provides higher counts of LPG [ 44 ]. However, when tested on bighorn sheep, FLOTAC’s performance in detecting mixed infections was poorer compared to the Baermann technique and the authors suggested that FLOTAC may be more useful in studies where total counts, and not taxonomic identity, are the primary objectives [ 56 ]. A quantitative method for the count of BPN larvae, based on a modified Baermann technique, was developed in a study on wild ruminants [ 57 ], and can be easily adapted to domestic ones.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to the Baermann technique, FLOTAC cuts down the time for sample processing and provides higher counts of LPG [ 44 ]. However, when tested on bighorn sheep, FLOTAC’s performance in detecting mixed infections was poorer compared to the Baermann technique and the authors suggested that FLOTAC may be more useful in studies where total counts, and not taxonomic identity, are the primary objectives [ 56 ]. A quantitative method for the count of BPN larvae, based on a modified Baermann technique, was developed in a study on wild ruminants [ 57 ], and can be easily adapted to domestic ones.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of pools was evaluated only in one study each for Fasciola hepatica [ 29 ] and protostrongylids [ 30 ], respectively for cattle and sheep, but never with a quantitative objective, even though quantitative diagnostic methods exist for both parasite groups. In addition to the standard diagnostic techniques (FEC for liver flukes and Baermann for BPN), FLOTAC was also recently validated for both liver flukes and bronchopulmonary nematodes [ 44 , 84 ], but further field testing is needed for a better comparison between these techniques [ 56 ]. For liver flukes, FEC remains the main diagnostic technique, but several other techniques are available in parallel and will probably be increasingly used in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Baermann technique was used to extract A. cantonensis L1 in rat faeces [ 17 , 18 ]. A wet preparation slide with a coverslip was made and viewed using conventional light microscopy using the 10× objective lens.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%