2021
DOI: 10.3390/math9222855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Molecular Geometry Optimization Methods Based on Molecular Descriptors

Abstract: Various methods (Hartree–Fock methods, semi-empirical methods, Density Functional Theory, Molecular Mechanics) used to optimize a molecule structure feature the same basic approach but differ in the mathematical approximations used. The geometry optimization procedure calculates the energy at an initial geometry of a molecule and then proceeds to search a new geometry with a lower energy. Using the 3D structures collected from the PubChem database, 20 amino acid geometry optimization calculations were performe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Terefore, this method will require rotating the atomic positions and doing energy calculations for each position until the minimum total energy is achieved. Te minimum energy of a molecule concerning atomic coordinates shows that geometry optimization leads to the most stable conformation of the related molecule [30][31][32]. Figure 1 shows the best geometric arrangement or structure of each molecule used in this study, while Table 1 shows the minimum optimization energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terefore, this method will require rotating the atomic positions and doing energy calculations for each position until the minimum total energy is achieved. Te minimum energy of a molecule concerning atomic coordinates shows that geometry optimization leads to the most stable conformation of the related molecule [30][31][32]. Figure 1 shows the best geometric arrangement or structure of each molecule used in this study, while Table 1 shows the minimum optimization energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 43 Furthermore, computed geometrical parameters of ZEA were in good agreement with those reported for the crystalline structure, 44 showing that the CAM-B3LYP/3-21G* level of theory can attain reasonable geometries of large systems. 45 50 Geometrical parameters such as the final end-to-end IM distance between monomers, monomers’ coplanarity loss, and monomers’ atom-to-atom intramolecular (iM) distortions come from ground-state geometry optimizations. Isolated dimers’ ground-state energies were achieved with a CAM-B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) level of theory; the last basis set of triple-ζ quality is widely employed to obtain accurate molecular energies.…”
Section: Computational Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employing quantum mechanical method to predict the electronegativity, as DFT does, would be useful in improving binding affinity estimations (Ryde & Söderhjelm 2016). Moreover, the DFT technique also produced a geometry-optimized and energy -minimized structure (Bálint & Jäntschi 2021), which helps to reach the optimum molecular docking analysis (Ramírez-Velásquez et al 2022). Therefore, by combining the DFT technique, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics approach, this study will explore the potential activity of Chrysin as the inhibitor of 3CP of FMDV, particularly for Indonesian serotype.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%