2009
DOI: 10.17221/21/2009-jfs
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of morphological and physiological parameters of the planting material of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) from intensive nursery technologies with current bareroot plants

Abstract: High quality of planting material is an essential prerequisite for successful artificial forest regeneration. We carried out a detailed investigation aimed at differences between plantable bareroot and container plants of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.). Based on the results of this experiment, there exist marked differences in basic morphological traits between bareroot plants and plugs. The largest differences were observed in root collar diameter and root system volume. Differences in physiological … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seedling quality is strongly associated with several morphological and physiological attributes of roots, stems, and leaves. It can be influenced by stock types, such as bare-root or container-grown [5][6][7], and nursery cultivation practices [8][9][10][11]. It is crucial to plant seedlings with attributes suited to the environment to achieve better performance after planting [3,11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seedling quality is strongly associated with several morphological and physiological attributes of roots, stems, and leaves. It can be influenced by stock types, such as bare-root or container-grown [5][6][7], and nursery cultivation practices [8][9][10][11]. It is crucial to plant seedlings with attributes suited to the environment to achieve better performance after planting [3,11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, significantly lower values of Hi recorded for BRT two years after planting as well as slightly lower survival rates compared to CRT one year after planting suggest on better early adaptation ability of CRT on planting site conditions in this study. In spite of prevailing size gap between commercially produced spruce CRT and BRT transplants (Leugner et al 2009;Jäärats et al 2016;Repáč et al 2017), growth increment or initial survival of CRT corresponding or slightly outperforming BRT during early years after planting have been observed also by Repáč & Belko (2020), Renou-Wilson et al (2008, Klavina et al (2013) or Jäärats et al (2016). According to Grossnickle & El-Kassaby (2016) better ability of CRT compared to BRT to overcome transplant shock under field conditions is related to crucial feature of CRT seedlings, well developed root system concentrated within the root plug.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…According to Grossnickle & El-Kassaby (2016) better ability of CRT compared to BRT to overcome transplant shock under field conditions is related to crucial feature of CRT seedlings, well developed root system concentrated within the root plug. Root plug of CRT seedlings protect root system before damage, provide favourable conditions for growth of new roots, as well as residues of water and mineral nutrients from nursery cultivation period, that are further available for transplants also under field conditions (Idris et al 2004;Leugner et al 2009;Grossnickle & El-Kassaby 2016). However, once a larger and more developed spruce BRT overcome planting check and become established, larger biomass of assimilatory organs, roots and other structures enable BRT transplant to accumulate more supplies required for growth and then produce also larger biomass increment (Hytönen & Jylhä 2008;Grossnickle & El-Kassaby 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations