1996
DOI: 10.1051/forest:19960106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of morphological characters and molecular markers for the analysis of hybridization in sessile and pedunculate oak

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These observed gene frequencies in progenies from Q. robur could be explained by fertilization of a proportion of female flowers by pollen of Q. petraea [4,6]. A similar indication of unidirectional gene flow in the same stand was observed when using RAPDs [5].…”
Section: Evidence Of Asymmetric Hybridization and Unidirectional Genesupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These observed gene frequencies in progenies from Q. robur could be explained by fertilization of a proportion of female flowers by pollen of Q. petraea [4,6]. A similar indication of unidirectional gene flow in the same stand was observed when using RAPDs [5].…”
Section: Evidence Of Asymmetric Hybridization and Unidirectional Genesupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Such a back-crossing pathway can explain the difficulties in finding species specific genetic markers in either the nuclear or cytoplasmic genomes of Q. robur and Q. petraea [4-6, 10, 15, 17, 20, 21]. Also, the fact that several morphological characters are needed to separate species support the theory of evolutionary significant introgression [5,11] although the two species can be separated by using several morphological characters in combination (e.g. [2,18,22]).…”
Section: Levels Of Gene Flow Between Q Petraea and Q Roburmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, these correlation coefficients were quite low, and for most populations, the degree of genetic and morphological intermediacy indicated by frequency distributions of hybrid index scores and morphological discriminant scores ( Fig. 2A (Bacilieri et al, 1996a;Kremer et al, 2002). Possible explanations for this phenomenon include maternal effects (i.e., hybrids are more similar to the species of their maternal parent), as well as selection against intermediate forms (Bacilieri et al, 1996a;Kremer et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…2A (Bacilieri et al, 1996a;Kremer et al, 2002). Possible explanations for this phenomenon include maternal effects (i.e., hybrids are more similar to the species of their maternal parent), as well as selection against intermediate forms (Bacilieri et al, 1996a;Kremer et al, 2002). In a mixed stand of Q. lobata and Q. douglasii, Craft et al (2002) found phenotypically intermediate trees that had little evidence of mixed ancestry according to microsatellites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Despite weak interspecific barriers, oak species involved in interspecific crosses usually remain distinct at the morphological, physiological, genetic and ecological levels (Whittemore and Schaal, 1991). In previous studies, hybrid oak individuals or populations have been reported to combine the morphological traits of both parental species (eg Bacilieri et al, 1996), and countless oak species have been described as hybrids, exclusively on the basis of morphological observations (Castroviejo et al, 1990). Their hybrid origin should in most of these situations be ascertained through genetic analysis, which, together with ecological studies, should also ensure that the assumed hybrid species is not a transient population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%