2021
DOI: 10.1080/19475705.2021.1912835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of multi-criteria-analytical hierarchy process and machine learning-boosted tree models for regional flood susceptibility mapping: a case study from Slovakia

Abstract: Identification of areas susceptible to floods is an important issue which requires an increased attention due to the changing frequency and magnitude of floods, which is mainly a result of the ongoing climate change and increasing anthropic pressure on the landscape. In this study, the aim was to identify the areas susceptible to floods using and comparing two different approaches, namely the multi-criteria decision analysis-analytical hierarchy process (MCDA-AHP) and the machine learning-boosted classificatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the recent approach by Costacheetal. 59 , 60 and Vojtek et al 61 , we developed a new advanced GSLDI and the SRs grazing pressure using ML algorithms. The proposed modeling framework consists of: (1) land erosion inventory (manually identifying erosion and no-erosion sampling points based on aerial imagery); (2) developing geographical characteristics (17 parameters, e.g., lithological structure, altitude) for each sampling point, (3) standardizing the dataset (55 subsequent attributes e.g., classes/features), and (4) ML model training process.…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the recent approach by Costacheetal. 59 , 60 and Vojtek et al 61 , we developed a new advanced GSLDI and the SRs grazing pressure using ML algorithms. The proposed modeling framework consists of: (1) land erosion inventory (manually identifying erosion and no-erosion sampling points based on aerial imagery); (2) developing geographical characteristics (17 parameters, e.g., lithological structure, altitude) for each sampling point, (3) standardizing the dataset (55 subsequent attributes e.g., classes/features), and (4) ML model training process.…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, management of natural environmental hazards (e.g., floods, landslides, gully can be assessed, mapped and predicted using machine learning (ML, a branch of artificial intelligence, algorithms and tools. More devoted literature using ML combined with diverse statistical methods (e.g., random forest—RF; boosted regression tree—BRT can be found in valuable scientific works focused on vulnerable territories (e.g., Himalayan regions, for example by Roy et al 55 , Chowdhuri et al 56 , 57 Pal et al 58 , Costache et al 59 , 60 and Vojtek et al 61 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCDA merupakan suatu alat pendekatan atau metode dalam pengambilan keputusan berdasarkan alternatif/ opsi solusi dari multi kriteria yang ada (Jaya et al, 2020). Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dapat didefinisikan sebagai metode untuk menguraikan permasalahan kompleks terkait banyaknya kriteria yang tidak terstruktur menjadi bagian-bagian yang lebih sederhana (sistem hierarkis) dengan hasil evaluasi yang didapatkan adalah faktor prioritas/ bobot (Vojtek et al, 2021)…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…The weighting mechanism employed the SAW method, giving equal weights to each analysis result. Mechanism development could be used in the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method based on expert-based assessments or weights derived through a community-based method that has been empirically tested [63,64].…”
Section: Limitations and Future Possible Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%