2008
DOI: 10.1109/tmc.2007.1075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Multichannel MAC Protocols

Abstract: Abstract-This paper compares, through analysis and simulation, a number of multichannel MAC protocols. We first classify these protocols into four categories based on their principles of operation: Dedicated Control Channel, Common Hopping, Split Phase, and Parallel Rendezvous protocols. We then examine the effects of the number of channels and devices, channel switching times, and traffic patterns on the throughput and delay of the protocols. Here are some of the conclusions of our study: 1) Parallel Rendezvo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 297 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distributed type is categorized into single rendezvous and parallel one [7]. In single rendezvous, the steady time period [5], [8], the steady frequency channel [5], [8], and the steady hopping pattern [9], [10] are used for the rendezvous channel. If the steady resources for rendezvous channel are used by PS, the construction of rendezvous channel is difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distributed type is categorized into single rendezvous and parallel one [7]. In single rendezvous, the steady time period [5], [8], the steady frequency channel [5], [8], and the steady hopping pattern [9], [10] are used for the rendezvous channel. If the steady resources for rendezvous channel are used by PS, the construction of rendezvous channel is difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will assume that the PU activity on a PU channel is characterized by an ON-OFF source model alternating between ON (busy) and OFF (idle) states, which has been widely used in numerous existing works [9]. To efficiently use available spectrum resources, the dedicated control channel approach [23] [24] is applied to perform the control signaling and data transmission simultaneously. Hence, it is assumed that there is a single control channel utilized by the SUs in the network.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, an energy-efficient non-overlapping channel MAC (ENC-MAC) for CRSNs is proposed. In order to process the control signaling and data transmission at the same time, the dedicated common control channel (CCC) approach is applied [23] [24]. It is assumed that the SUs are equipped with two half-duplex transceivers to efficiently perform the four aforementioned phases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The channel structure of CA-MAC is based on the split phase multichannel MAC protocols described in [20,21], where time is divided into a number of phases for control and data transmission. Unlike them, CA-MAC does not use a CCC and has two radio interfaces.…”
Section: Channel Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%