2013 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2013.6831263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Multipath TCP and CMT-SCTP based on intercontinental measurements

Abstract: Abstract-The market penetration of access devices with multiple network interfaces has increased dramatically over the last few years. As a consequence, there is a strong interest to use all of the available interfaces concurrently to improve data throughput. Corresponding extensions of established Transport protocols are receiving considerable attention within research and standardization.Currently two approaches are in the focus of the IETF: The Multipath TCP (MPTCP) extension for TCP and the Concurrent Mult… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While MPTCP is quite widely accepted and deployed, the CMT-SCTP extension is only available for FreeBSD [216]. A comparison between the two implementations of MPTCP and CMT-SCTP by using lab measurements as well as intercontinental test-bed (e.g., Europe and China) is provided by Becke et al [216].…”
Section: Available Implementationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While MPTCP is quite widely accepted and deployed, the CMT-SCTP extension is only available for FreeBSD [216]. A comparison between the two implementations of MPTCP and CMT-SCTP by using lab measurements as well as intercontinental test-bed (e.g., Europe and China) is provided by Becke et al [216].…”
Section: Available Implementationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison between the two implementations of MPTCP and CMT-SCTP by using lab measurements as well as intercontinental test-bed (e.g., Europe and China) is provided by Becke et al [216]. The authors show that the path management of MPTCP outperforms the one of CMT-SCTP in case of asymmetric paths.…”
Section: Available Implementationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This differs from the behavior of SCTP, where only a remote peer address defines a path [3]. On the other hand, as [10] shows, this allows utilization of all possible paths. The option ADD ADDR is used to announce an additional IP address to the remote host.…”
Section: The Basics Of Multi-path Tcpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, research on various topics of multi-homing and multi-path transport is currently ongoing, e.g. on path stability [10], congestion control [5], [11] and fairness [12], load sharing [13]- [15], scheduling [16], [17], network coding [18], shared bottleneck detection [19], [20], and various other topics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%